@Ultraviolet
Idiots like you always fail to distinguish between a popes private book which does not form part of his magisterium and official teaching.
You were asked many many times to post ONE single example of formal doctrinal heresy officially promoted by a pope in his office as a teacher .
You have failed time and time again to provide one single example as you scurry around sedevacantist websites.
When your deceits are exposed , like the the whited sepulchre that you are you resort to tactics of intimidation and aggression wishing diseases on people.
You and Bergoglio are very very well suited and nobody is surprised you support such a swine.

There was nothing "private" about the book. You made that up. Another lie. If Pope Francis had published such a book, you would be all over it screaming non-stop. You love inventing these arbitrary distinctions when they suit you and then dropping them just as quickly.

"You were asked many many times to post ONE single example of formal doctrinal heresy officially promoted by a pope in his office as a teacher."

Go check the links. That PDF is a real winner. That's what real "doctrinal heresy" reads like when it's written by a Pope.

>This is your "qualifications" tactic:
You invent these extra qualifications so you can discount every piece of evidence that refutes your lies. That heresy wasn't "officially promoted" and that heresy wasn't "in his office as a teacher."

You fraud. I defy you to cite Canon Law verbatim where these qualifications supposedly exist. You can't and you won't because you made them up .

"You have failed time and time again to provide one single example..."

>This is your "repetition" tactic.

Same lies from the same guy. You ignore all information that refutes your nonsense. You literally pretend it doesn't exist when the blasted links are right there in front of you highlighted in blue

"as you scurry around sedevacantist websites."

>This is your "defamation" tactic.

You defame the source because you can't counter the information as you must. It's real simple, Thor. The last four Popes were just as "guilty" of promoting heresy as Francis.

Either you hold ALL Popes to equal standards or give ALL the Popes the benefit of the doubt. You're a hypocrite and a liar, nothing more.

If anything, you're the only "sedevacantist" here. Benedict XVI resigned. There is a Pope and his name is Francis.

"you resort to tactics of intimidation and aggression wishing diseases on people."

>This is your "victim" tactic.

It usually appears when a critic makes a point you don't like. Then they're "intimidating" you or inflicting "aggression" on you. That's just you making things up again.

@ @Ultraviolet
There you howling accusations of lies again.
The issue truly miserable people like you fail to understand time, after time, after time is the critical distinction between a popes private opinions and official magisterial papal teaching.
This distinction has always been recognized.
Once again I ask you to post a single doctrinal heresy that was officially promulgated by a sitting pope via his office as teacher.
it has never happened and you flounder about in a morass of sedevacantist websites that also fail to make these crucial distinctions.
Heretic Bergoglio stage name”pope” Francis has sought to promulgate doctrinal formal heresy in Amoris Laetitia and this attempt alone invalidates completely any putative claim he might ever have had to a valid papacy.
Now off with you and study what the word “ distinctions “ mean in theology and law..
Also study basic Christian and human manners as your conduct to date indicate your upbringing was very defective in this area.

"There you howling accusations of lies again."

On the contrary, @Thors Catholic Hammer . I'll be howling when I bold-text most of a post the way you like to. But I am publicly accusing you of being a liar.

You claimed Benedict's book was "private". That is a lie. It's readily available on Amazon.

"truly miserable people like you"

Let's see how long it takes before you complain how you're the victim of "vitriol" "abusive posts" "aggression" and "intimidation" when you're mocked for being an idiot.

"...the critical distinction between a popes private opinions and official magisterial papal teaching."

I asked you to cite Canon Law showing this distinction.

You haven't'. You won't. You make up these imaginary "canonical sounding" distinctions out of thin air. By now I can tell by your writing style when you're telling a lie.

The qualifications always start padding out your claims... "an official magisterial papal"... etc. etc. etc. You add these verbabl back-doors so you can run out them later. Oh that heresy isn't an official teaching. And that heresy isn't a magisterial teaching and that heresy isn's something else and so on.

The other give-away is when you start using passive voice to create support for your claim: "This distinction has always been recognized." Recognized by whom? Your fantasy supporters. If "this distinction has always been recognized." then you should find it an easy matter to cite Canon Law the way you like to do when you're claiming Benedict didn't really resign.

Cite Canon Law or your claim is outed as another lie.

"Once again I ask you to post a single doctrinal heresy that was officially promulgated by a sitting pope via his office as teacher."

This again? :D First, YOU need to cite canon law where all these imaginary qualifications even exist: "officially promulgated by a sitting pope via his office as teacher".

Benedict has undoubtedly taught and advanced heresy as a "sitting Pope". His books are rife with them.

"it has never happened and you flounder about in a morass of sedevacantist websites"

Usual lies from a proven liar.

I repost the links to sites dedicated to showing a Pope's heresy, you lie and say I haven't posted any, then you baww the sites are "sedevacantist". How would you know that unless you visited them, hmmm? You see? You catch yourself in your own lies.

It's also a genetic fallacy. Attack the information, not the source! Like the info here:

novusordowatch.org/…/deniers-of-the-…

www.traditionalmass.org/images/articles/RazResArt.pdf

You've obviously visited the sites, you can't refute the heresies previous popes have advanced because they are what they are. So you do what you always do. You lie. They don't count, they weren't "officially" (qualified with more imaginary qualifications on top of more qualifications) taught and so on.

As for your "Amoris Laetitia" claims. You'd better take them up with Cardinal Burke.

novusordowatch.org/…/burke-francis-n…

Simply put, you're a liar. You claiming anything at this point requires independent verification.

I haven't forgotten how you claimed Benedict XVI "still wears his Papal ring". That's what I'm talking about. You made that up. He doesn't. You lied. All you ever do lie and repeat the lies hoping they'll "stick" if you parrot them on every post..

Seriously Crackers, it's boring and dishonest,