Schneider is a coward, and a hypocrit. He celebrates the traditional Latin Mass, but he won't stand in unison with traditional Catholics against he would would have the traditional Mass banned and wiped from the earth....Pope Francis.
Many past Catholic theologians, including great saints, have said that a Pope who departs from tradition and the teachings of the Faith, as Pope Francis and his people have, is a heretic and by that fact loses the Papal office.
I would rather side with the several great saints, including Doctors of the Church who have said this, rather than some obscure hack who wears beautiful vestments, celebrates the traditional Mass, defends its promotion, but who doesn't stand against a heretic Pope who would destroy it all in the name of a globalist NWO religion.

As a side note, I just found out....Francis isn't going to Marseilles for any Catholic, religious purpose, but to preach acceptance/open doors for migrants. That will go over REAL WELL in France and Italy. I'd love to see rallies against him in France, and in Italy when he returns to Rome.

Very disappointing. Bp. Schneider proves here that he is just another closet modernist defending an invalid pope. He has twisted Bellarmine to his own advantage and avoided mentioning others who hold different opinions, opinions supporting the premise that an heretical pope loses the office automatically.
His premise that "an invalid election would be de facto healed through the acceptance of the overwhelming majority of cardinals and bishops" is ludicrous. Does the majority of the populace supporting the right to abortion, make it morally acceptable? Come on, Bp., you've got to do better than that! His entire argument is unacceptable and just plain STUPID!!!

So we're stuck with Bergoglio et al until he's dead. That doesn't mean faithful Catholics have to obey him. The SSPX and other groups, sedevacantists or not, have the right idea. So does the great Bishop Strickland and others. Bergoglio might be Pope, but that doesn't mean we have to blindly obey him and the dictates of his homo advisors like zombies. That would be more like a cult, when we know something is against Church teaching and tradition but obey it anyway. If more faithful Catholics had stood up to Paul VI at the time the Novus Ordo was introduced and said that it was wrong, a break in the Faith like Cardinals Bacci and Ottaviani and Lefebvre, we wpuld not be in such a disaster as today.
Whatever heresy comes from the "Synod", just ignore Bergoglio and his trolls.

As always, the very excellent Bishop Schneider speaks TRUTH and brings much needed clarity to this eternity-impacting subject. The sedevacantists and those who have begun to drink deeply and copiously from their deadly poisoned chalice have gotten out of hand around here these days.

But seriously, let’s be clear, absolutely NO person or agency on earth has the competency or holds the authority to officially and juridically judge or condemn a legitimately elected Supreme Pontiff for any reason whatsoever while he yet lives and sits on the Throne of Saint Peter as the Bishop of Rome. Canon Law and the Magisterium of the Church allows for NO SUCH THING to take place. The Vicar of Christ and Successor of Saint Peter cannot be judged by any man while he reigns and rules, but is himself, the judge of all.

Any concept expressed to the contrary (and yes, throughout the centuries there have been many expressed regarding this subject) is simply the articulation of personal opinion, totally and entirely without the force of Canon Law, which contains no such provision within its edicts, even when expressed by sainted theologians and Doctors of the Church.

By foregoing and omitting the specific establishment in Canon Law of a well-defined juridical process or procedure to empower a person or a designated group of persons with the legitimate authority to formally judge, condemn, discipline and depose a duley elected sitting Supreme Pontiff, invalidate and revoke his acts and repudiate his teaching, the Church has made it unequivocally clear that only a future Pope can declare a prior Pope heretical or condemn the acts of his papacy. The Lord Jesus Christ Himself, while He was physically present on earth, declared that Peter (and subsequently, all those who would succeed him) is the very Rock upon which His Church is built, and entrusted him with the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven and the absolute supremacy to bind and loose whatsoever he wills, without equal or peer in spiritual authority, dominion and power anywhere on this earth. Such is the infallible, irrevocable, irreversible, dogmatic teaching of Holy Mother Church, which every Catholic is bound by and required to believe and adhere to. The sooner we understand and accept that fundamental, but inescapable, fact of life in the Church, and cease these satan-spawned, Luther-mimicking, heretically ridiculous notions that the Seat and See of Peter is empty while there is yet a living, breathing Pope occupying it, the better off we will all be.