@rhemes1582: How do you know that Barrett is not a Communist? The beloved Justice Roberts turned out to be one... Besides that: The "Errors of Russia" have left Russia almost 30 years ago and are now reigning in the United States and its European satellites (but not in Russia anymore = that's why Russia is so hated by the Western Communists). The Soviet Block has died, so have Hitler and Napoleon. As a whole D and R (and similar parties in the Western satellites) are part of the same medal and, yes, I agree un updated version of atheistic Communism.

@Cuthbert Mayne: I agree with all of your points. There is a further point: the Sacramentum Tantum = the visible rite of the sacrament. In this case there are two visual perspectives: one is the camera and one is the priest. The perspective of the camera is dreadful, so it should not have been there to begin with. It gives a distorted and dreadful view of the sacrament (yes, Christ was also lying down during the Last Supper, and, no, Holy Mass is not an imitation of the Last Supper). There is the perspective of the priest who is not able to stand up anymore and who celebrates Mass according to his possibilities (why without vestments?). The situation, this priest is in, does not a priori preclude him from saying Mass, however, it does preclude him from saying Mass for a congregation which has virtually been brought in through the camera. It's wrong to display every detail of the Mass into the eyes of the viewers, many parts of the Mass are hidden (at least in the original Roman Rite), here it is even wronger to do so, for obvious reasons.