"with Bank of Germany blocked the payments at the Vatican."This is called a Post Hoc Fallacy. Correlation does not prove causation.
"- There was nothing else done against the pretext of money-laundering scheme invoked by Bank of Italy,"...that YOU know about
Ludovic Denim . Bankers don't broadcast every private decision and negotiation in the news.
"That Pope Benedict XVI chose to announce his resignation this very day is not a coincidence as many know that magistrates used to chose a date in memory of an event that please them in the same way."First, you're assuming this is the case for Benedict without showing proof that it is so. Second, let us assume you are correct and Benedict XVI chose the date as a reference. You've already acknowledged it is the Feast for Our Lady Of Lourdes, so you've already provided an explanation for the date.
Third, Benedict XVI did not
resign on 11th February 2013. If your theory was correct, he should have resigned on that date. He didn't. He
resigned on 28 February 2013 which disproves your theory.
"The light struck the dome of the Vatican the same day the 11th February 2013 and no one that believe in God's signs can say that it's a mere coincidence..."...because God expresses his displeasure with such
weak displays??? Read your bible, Ludovic. When God is angry, humanity knows it. This has already been debunked.
www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21630874The Vatican itself denied it.
Incidentally, Jim Caviezel was
also struck by lighting while on the cross in the role of Jesus. It's still the best, most brutal depiction of The Crucifixion ever filmed.
"Pope Francis is not validly elected, we have the talks of some Cardinals that plotted to get rid of Pope Benedict and get Francis"There are
always scheming cardinals. Welcome to Italian politics, Ludovic! If you truly believe Cardinals
don't do this for every Pope, then you're even more naive than John Paul II trying to forbid the same practice that got him elected.
"Our Lady can't be wrong as she knows everything she wants from her Son who is God."Of course Our Lady can not be wrong. I
fully agree with you there. But
your interpretation of Our Lady's words definitely CAN be wrong. She didn't name the Pope she was referring to, did she? No? Then
your interpretation is just like anyone else's.
"And last but not least, even Francis doesn't recognise himself as the Pope given that he officially de-emphasizes papal titles."Pope Francis enjoys such false displays of "humility". Technically, Francis is Bishop of Rome. He still acknowledges himself as Pope and rules with an iron fist.
"He acts like he's still just a Bishop...Don't we all wish?
:D On the contrary, Francis is so tyrannical he has been nicknamed the "Dictator Pope". It even became the title of a book.
cruxnow.com/…/author-of-the-d…Got anything else?
I do appreciate you offering some
new interpretations. I don't agree with them, naturally. They're easily disproved and without too much effort. But I'm
still grateful. At least they were your own.
I can't describe how boring it is to see Thor parrotting Bugnolo on Canon Laws 17, 188, and 332:2.
Actually, on second thought, I
can describe it. I just refrain from using such language here on GTV.
;-)