Look your Eminence,
I hear you loud and clear.

This is the Jesuit agenda that Francis is promoting to the Laity.
He along with them will gladly place this into action.
Francis won't take the heat for this, as this is the will of the Novus ordo people.

It's an Apostate Church - and don't you forget it.
.

It's already been done.

Definitions are for new dogma, e.g., Immaculate Conception. That the Church can only ordain men is what is called a secondary object of infallibility.

VatII (Lumen Gentium) extended the Infallible authority of the Ordinary Universal Magisterium to Secondary Objects. This is a recognition of the Infallibility of Tradition.

No. Apparently it HASN’T been done to the extent to which I refer, nor to the extent that silences continual and ceaseless debate, discussion and disagreement among some of the Church’s leading theologians and highest ranking clerics, including within the Vatican hierarchy itself. It must be infallibly Declared, Decreed and Defined as indisputable, irreformable Dogma in such a way that brooks no further argument or conjecture regarding the subject, in the same way and with as much visible and tangible exercise and display of the supreme Apostolic and Teaching authority of the Holy Roman Pontiff when he proclaims Dogma directly and explicitly ex Cathedra, as was done by Pope Pius XII when he promulgated Munificentissimus Deus in 1950 with great solemnity, ceremony and ecclesiastical fanfare. Thus, what I propose has never been done regarding the issue of the impossibility of women receiving Holy Orders. What you advocate, however, and the theory by which you arrive at your supposition regarding this matter, unlike what immediately occurred and has since occurred in the Church as a result of Pope Pius XII issuing the Proclamation of the Dogma of the Assumption, clearly has not worked and IS NOT working, at least not in any way that would staunch and silence any further or ongoing debate, dissent, discussion or theorizing about the subject. The next Holy Father must “up the ante” and “raise the stakes” so to speak, in a full demonstration of his supreme Apostolic authority, utilizing the ZENITH of the majestic power of the Petrine Office to affirm and decree this forever as immutable, indisputable, infallible Dogma, which all Catholic Faithful MUST hold, believe and adhere to, always and everywhere, throughout the whole of Holy Mother Church.

No, you're wrong. You need to read my comments again. For a pope to define it would undermine Tradition.

After OS no one challenged the teaching. Only when a 1970s Jesuit became pope and gave the impression that everything was up for grabs did snakes come out from under the rocks.

OS already says that this teaching has to be held definitively by all the Church's faithful: hancque sententiam ab omnibus Ecclesiae fidelibus esse definitive tenendam

Once again: The IC was new dogma.

And underlining words or using a bold font does not make them true.

@Dr Bobus is correct. You will find the infallibility of male ordination discussed in this Vatican document: Professio Fidei

"A similar process can be observed in the more recent teaching regarding the doctrine that priestly ordination is reserved only to men. The Supreme Pontiff, while not wishing to proceed to a dogmatic definition, intended to reaffirm that this doctrine is to be held definitively,32 since, founded on the written word of God, constantly preserved and applied in the Tradition of the Church, it has been set forth infallibly by the ordinary and universal Magisterium.33"