May Our Lady of Grace pray for us!

Amen.

With respect to the heretical and blasphemous interpretation of Bergoglio of the Greeting of the Archangel Gabriel ´Full of Grace´ to the Virgin Mary, the sites of Catholic apologetics also destroy this heretical blasphemy of Bergoglio:
"When the angel Gabriel uses κεχαριτομένη to refer to Mary, he uses the word as a pronoun (a pronoun takes the place of a name or a title), which represents the identity of the person that is being talked about. The Archangel refers to the Virgin Mary as the "full of grace". In the case of Esteban on the other hand it is an adjective "pleres" (full) followed by the genitive "charitos" (χαριτοω) (of grace). Adjectives reflect the qualities of subjects, while pronouns replace or identify the subject in a sentence".

The blasphemous apostate Jorge Bergoglio is treated as if he were a god while opening his mouth to utter his blasphemies, this time against Our Lady.
Woe to you Bergoglio; in your stubborn rebellion against God you make the biblical anathemas fall upon you and your followers again and again.
Pope Pius IX destroys this heretical blasphemy proffered by the apostate Jorge Mario Bergoglio in his Apostolic Epistle "INEFFABILIS DEUS" of December 8, 1854 ON THE DOGMA OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION

THE ANNUNCIATION
When the Fathers and writers of the Church meditated on the fact that the most Blessed Virgin was, in the name and by order of God himself, proclaimed full of grace[22] by the Angel Gabriel when he announced her most sublime dignity of Mother of God, they thought that this singular and solemn salutation, never heard before, showed that the Mother of God is the seat of all divine graces and is adorned with all gifts of the Holy Spirit. To them Mary is an almost infinite treasury, an inexhaustible abyss of these gifts, to such an extent that she was never subject to the curse and was, together with her Son, the only partaker of perpetual benediction. Hence she was worthy to hear Elizabeth, inspired by the Holy Spirit, exclaim: "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb."[23]

"Kejaritomene" is a greeting that translates from "Χαίρε, Μαρία, κεχαριτωμένη" and whose meaning is "Hail Mary full of Grace" χαριτω indicates a state of full Grace. That is to say: without sin.
Full of Grace forever and ever. Gratia Plena. The Blessed Virgin Mary is that Woman wrapped in the Sun from her immaculate conception on which the Holy Spirit rested.
The iconography often represents the Archangel Gabriel kneeling before the blessed Virgin Mary because the greeting of the Hail that is done to the royalty comes on bended knee. That is to say that the Archangel addresses the Blessed Virgin Mary greeting her as Queen.

Once again we see that Jorge Mario Bergoglio does not profess the Catholic faith and has heretical ideas of Protestant heretics so he is not a valid Catholic pope because he was a heretic before his invalid election. He also went so far as to compare the Virgin Mary with the radical feminist, abortion supporting, progay Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo.

I'm finding it terribly difficult to view this man as being a validly ordained Pope. Here he is discussing matters regarding Faith and Morals - subjects which a validly ordained Pontiff is able to speak about infallibly under the guidance of the Holy Ghost

HOWEVER. Here he teaches/preaches not only contrary to Dogmatic Church Teaching - he speaks heretically and wilfully blasphemes the known key teachings regarding the Bride of the Holy Ghost. The Holy Ghost is the expert on the Holy Virgin since She is His Bride. It has already been revealed via the Sacred Magesterium and Holy Scripture whom Our Lady is - and that she was immaculately conceived and by the power of Her Divine Spouse, the Holy Ghost - she became the Mother of the Incarnate Son of God. That is Church teaching, and the Holy Ghost would not preach falsely about His own Bride - It is totally OBVIOUS here - that he is not a validly ordained Pope.

Our Lady was “a normal girl", "a girl of today", "open to getting married and to having a family” before the archangel Gabriel visited her, Pope Francis claims in a new interview book talking to Father Marco Pozza, 38.
----------------------------------------
Lord, Have Mercy. I wish I were his editor so I could dump this kind of garbage before it became public.

St. Augustine rightly says, that ‘Mary certainly would not have spoken those words ( not to know man,” that is, to be and remain a virgin) if she had not vowed her virginity to God.” In fact, only by admitting Mary’s virginal consecration to God, can it be understood why she found herself facing an unsolvable dilemma: How to reconcile her virginal offering to God with the request of maternity on the part of God? How could she become a mother without betraying a promise of virginal consecration to God (Stefano Manelli, All Generations Shall Call Me Blessed, pages 137-140). catholicstrength.com/…/mary-consecrate…

The Blessed Virgin was raised under the lawful title of "The First Born" as her parents had no "First Born SON" to be given the title to.
Thus when it states in the Gospel "She gave birth to her FIRST BORN" it is a legal title only - it is the name allotted to the "Heir" it does not infer that other children were born to her.
The Infancy Gospel of James speaks of the birth of the Holy Virgin, she was given (like Samuel) to the Temple and housed there taking vows of permanent celibacy. At the time of her maturity, the Officials of the Temple gave her to be legally betrothed to St Joseph, an elderly widower of the Tribe of Judah ( it was Jewish practice that people married spouses of the same Tribe - although Priests sometimes were allowed to marry widows of other Tribes on occasion) St Joseph according to the Early Church writings was also a consecrated Celibate.
The early Church Fathers termed Our Lady "The Ark of the New (or HIS) Covenant" Purely because like the Old Ark contained the 10 Commandments - the word of God on stone, The Blessed Virgin bore within herself, the Word of God - made flesh. As the Old Ark contained the Manna, Our Lady contained within herself the LIVING Manna.
As the Ark spent 6 months in the Hill Country, so did the New Ark go and stay in the Hill Country with St Elizabeth. As David "Leaped before the Old Ark" so did St John the Baptist "Leap" before the Holy Virgin from within the womb of St Elizabeth
Lastly, as David said "How is it that the Ark of the Lord should come to ME?" So did St Elizabeth cry to Our Lady "Who am I that the MOTHER of My Lord come to me"

Basically anybody who touched the Old Ark - unworthily (for instance Uzzah in 2 Samuel) discovered immediately that they were considered far from worthy - and they received an electric shock that killed them outright.
Our Lady is the Immaculate Conception - created "Pure" and "Sanctified" in her Mother's womb to bear later, the Only Begotten Son of God, the Word made Flesh.

Basically, Francis is a Blasphemer, a Heretic and an unworthy successor of St Peter. His insistance that the Holy Virgin (The Ark of Our Lord Jesus Christ) is like every other girl, is indefensible. May God reward our sorrow and send us a Pope that Our Lord Jesus will reward with Heaven for his sanctity, good manners and respect for the Chastity and Holiness of the Ever Virgin Mary. Chosen Daughter of God the Father, Bride of the Holy Ghost, and Mother of the Eternal Word made Flesh.

Just like every modern girl?
Francis is either insane or a inspired by the Devil to insult the Holy Mother of the Lord chosen from all eternity to be the Bride of the Holy Spirit and Mother of the Divine Incarnate Son of God..

Mary
The Footprints of God: Mary The Mother of God-----------uploaded by irapuato
Peter
The Footprints of God: Peter Keeper of the Keys
Paul
The Footprints of God: Paul Contending for the Faith
Jesus and the Jewish Roots
www.youtube.com/watch