Pontifical Biblical Commission Whitewashes Homosexual Fornication
- Report
Social networks
Change post
Remove post
HerzMariae
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Full text (translated by Edward Pentin): The institution of marriage, constituted by the stable relationship between husband and wife, is constantly presented as evident and normative in the whole biblical tradition. There are no examples of legally recognized ‘unions’ between persons of the same sex.
For some time now, particularly in Western culture, voices of dissent have been heard about the …More
For some time now, particularly in Western culture, voices of dissent have been heard about the anthropological approach of Scripture, as it is understood and transmitted by the Church in its normative aspects; in fact, all this is judged as the simple reflection of an archaic, historically-conditioned mentality. We know that many biblical statements, in the fields of cosmology, biology, and sociology, have gradually been considered outdated with the progressive affirmation of the natural and human sciences. Similarly — it can be deduced by some — a new and more adequate understanding of the human person imposes a radical reservation about the exclusive value of the heterosexual union, in favor of a similar acceptance of homosexuality and homosexual unions as a legitimate and worthy expression of the human being. Moreover — it is sometimes argued — the Bible says little or nothing about this type of erotic relationship, which is therefore not condemned, because it is often unduly confused with other aberrant sexual behaviors. It therefore seems necessary to examine the passages of Sacred Scripture in which the problem of homosexuality is discussed, in particular those in which it is denounced and blamed.
It is doubtful that the Bible does not speak of the erotic inclination towards a person of the same sex, but only of homosexual acts. And it deals with these in a few texts, different from each other in terms of literary genre and importance. As far as the Old Testament is concerned, we have two accounts (Genesis 19 and Judges 19) that wrongly evoke this aspect, and then some norms in a legislative Code (Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13) that condemn homosexual relations.
Knights4Christ
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Knights4Christ
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
frjimanderson
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Jorge Cerra
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
There are numerous multiple references in the Bible to husbands and wives.To assert there is no legal example of a recognized union is therefore false. These marriages would have taken place under either Roman Law or ancient Jewish law as or if recognized by the secular authority.
It is quite clear that the Vatican is under the domination of a mafia determined to subvert and destroy the roman catholic …More
It is quite clear that the Vatican is under the domination of a mafia determined to subvert and destroy the roman catholic religion and its core doctrines on marriage and the entire sacramental system.
The individual pushing all this is called Jorge Maria Bergoglio who also uses the name 'pope francis" . In my opinion he ceased to be a roman catholic some time ago and hence can no longer be lawfully recognized as a valid pope.
Indeed it is also extremely doubtful he ever was elected a pope considering the the real pope benedict xvi still occupies the Chair of St Peter.
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Poor confused Benedict xvi is a catholic and is the pope.
Pray for him.
"Benedict XVI is ...the pope."??? Thors, please, read this:
The Fox in the Henhouse
The defenders of the thesis 'Benedict is the Pope' focus their attention on the Canon Law, and although it seems to be extremely precise, it is not the letter of the law that animates the organism which is the Church, but the Holy Ghost. Look at the mass readings of Thursday, February 28, 2013, the last day of Pope …More
The Fox in the Henhouse
The defenders of the thesis 'Benedict is the Pope' focus their attention on the Canon Law, and although it seems to be extremely precise, it is not the letter of the law that animates the organism which is the Church, but the Holy Ghost. Look at the mass readings of Thursday, February 28, 2013, the last day of Pope Benedict XVI at the Holy See. Writing hurriedly his Latin Act of the Renunciation on February 10, he hardly had time to check what the mass readings would be on the last day of his office, after which 'sede vacante' was to begin (February 28, 2013, 8 pm CET) - they are completely devastating for him.
The First Reading, Jeremiah 17: 5-10; already the initial verse [5] reveals a significant flaw, which is not fitting for the person of the vicar of Jesus Christ:
"This said the Lord:
«Cursed man who puts hope in man
and who sees his strength in the body,
and turns his heart away from the Lord."
Didn't Benedict XVI justify his epochal decision by "the strength of body", did he not? His act of Renunciation is, in fact, the realization of God's judgment on Rome (and his pope), which was passed earlier [Jer 17, 3-4]:
„Sacrificing in the field: I will give thy strength, and all thy treasures to the spoil, and thy high places for sin in all thy borders. And thou shalt be left stripped of thy inheritance, which I gave thee: and I will make thee serve thy enemies in a land which thou knowest not: because thou hast kindled a fire in my wrath, it shall burn for ever.”
After 28 February 2013, wasn't the Roman Catholic church – 'the Mountain on the plain', the Vatican Hill in particular - handed over to her enemies? Over time, this has become evident to all who have seeing eyes, hearing ears and feeling hearts (and care about the fate of the Church).
An extra verse [Jer 17, 11] revealing the significant omission of Pope Benedict XVI:
„As the partridge hath hatched eggs which she did not lay: so is he that hath gathered riches, and not by right: in the midst of his days he shall leave them, and in his latter end he shall be a fool.”
Jorge the Apostate received the episcopal ordination and cardinal purple by decision of Pope John Paul II. Cardinal Bergoglio was the main rival of Cardinal Ratzinger at the AD2005 conclave. Why, being already Pope, Benedict XVI did not watch with the greatest attention this egg tossed from the end of the world, from Argentina?! Instead of throwing them out of the nest, as befits a vigilant host, he brooded the egg for years. The hen have sat out an egg for herself: the company of the sly fox, spiritual monster, the devourer of immortal souls! And when the hellish "chicken" hatched (March 13, 2013), instead of raising a scream at this sight, this hen (after all, not a rooster) made friends with this fox, which allowed her to take refuge in an abandoned henhouse (monastery) in the same garden on the Vatican Hill.
The Responsorial Psalm [PS 1, 1-2. 3.4 and 6]; as a comment I quote the omitted verse 5:
"Therefore the wicked shall not rise again in judgment: nor sinners in the council of the just."
What a judgment is this about? [John 16, 8-11]:
„And when he is come, he [the Paraclete] will convict the world of sin, and of justice, and of judgment. Of sin: because they believed not in me. And of justice: because I go to the Father; and you shall see me no longer. And of judgment: because the prince of this world is already judged.” Yes, the Lord Jesus leaving Rome in the person of his last vicar, the Pope Benedict XVI, made free space for the Paraclete, the other Comforter.
The Gospel [Luke 16, 19-31] of February 28, 2013 leaves no doubt that this is not just about Rome, but about the whole Church of Christ, whose visible head was Pope Benedict XVI. The verses 27-28 speak of it: " And he said: Then, father, I beseech thee, that thou wouldst send him to my father's house, for I have five brethren, That he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torments. " These five brothers are five traditional patriarchates: Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, Constantinople. The last Pope personally gave Rome in the hands of his successor, the terminator from Buenos Aires!
November 25, 2019 on the feast of the Virgin of Kykkos*, Nicosia, Cyprus and Saint Catherine of Alexandria, Virgin and Martyr
*Kykkos - etymologically from the Greek Κούκος, meaning 'cuckoo', the only breeding parasite in Europe.
P.S.
I really like the learned arguments of experts in Canon Law, in particular Fra Alexis Bugnolo's and Ann Barnhardt's, but Sancta Ecclesia is not the work of a canonist but of the Holy Spirit.
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Hello M yron M.
Thank you for that interesting article. My approach to the papacy is based on what is good for the church. When a pope attempts to resign this is an extremely serious matter and very very rare event. A pope has every right, nay even a duty sometimes to resign.
Therefore in such rare circumstances what protections are there in existence to govern such acts when they occur ?. Not many …More
Thank you for that interesting article. My approach to the papacy is based on what is good for the church. When a pope attempts to resign this is an extremely serious matter and very very rare event. A pope has every right, nay even a duty sometimes to resign.
Therefore in such rare circumstances what protections are there in existence to govern such acts when they occur ?. Not many and there are only a few canon laws that govern such acts but they are precise and highly specific.
The Holy S pirit works through canon law. It exists to protect the church and her members from mistakes, wrongdoing and abuse at all levels.
It is , unlike scripture, updated frequently and therefore a more reliable guide to interpreting the life of the Holy Spirit working in the contemporary church.
A pope who resigns but fails to do so strictly in accordence with all the norms of canon law is abusing his position. With pope Benedict that may have been intentional or unintentional. Pope Benedict is a very complex mystery and the reasons for this alleged resignation never stood up to proper scrutiny.
The resignation statement itself was never thoroughly scrutinised by canon lawyers for defects as should have happened.
My position in all conscience is that I truly believe that Pope Benedict xvi willingly erred in his resignation speech in such fashion that he still actually holds the papal office [munus] and sought to transfer the administrative functions of governing to another man.
The Petrine Office can only subsist in one man not in two as per Christs very clear words to St Peter.
Therefore I have concluded with certainty for some time that P ope Benedict still sits in the chair of St Peter.
The absolutly devastating spectacle of a an apostate pagan formally heretical jesuit priest then pretending to come in and usurp the C hair of St Peter is to my mind just further proof that B enedict did not in fact resign the papacy.
No normal catholic could ever ever have any kind of spiritual unity with the false teaching belched out almost daily by Fr. Jorge Bergoglio SJ aka "pope francis".
He is a divider and a destroyer and needs to be ousted asap.
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
This sodomite sect acts as an Anglican apostata sect. They commit the Sin of Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit by rejecting the Catholic sexual moral doctrine that all Catholics have the obligation to believe. You cannot be a Catholic and tell Christ that he cannot reign in the sexual area and that he must be expelled from human sexuality. When God created man and woman and then joined them in …More
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
All that keeps this massive charade in place is the frightened obedience of a cowed and supine clergy fearful of losing their jobs.
All catholics are advised to shun and avoid this dangerous spiritual enemy called "pope" francis.
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment

Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Bergoglio is not merely an enemy of the roman catholic faith , he is an enemy of the entire human race.
He has usurped the Chair of St.Peter and abuses the office by corrupting core catholic teaching in a deceptive manner to confuse the faithful
The catholic church is the sole voice of God on earth.
As such the salvation of the human race depends on her.
Bergoglios deceits imperil that programme …More
He has usurped the Chair of St.Peter and abuses the office by corrupting core catholic teaching in a deceptive manner to confuse the faithful
The catholic church is the sole voice of God on earth.
As such the salvation of the human race depends on her.
Bergoglios deceits imperil that programme and those supporting him will be judged gravely.
His name should be stricken from the cannon of the mass.
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Check out how many of the current members of the Pontifical Biblical Commission were appointed in 2014 and how many had their membership terminated 2013-2014.
www.vatican.vaMore
www.vatican.va
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment

One more comment from la verdad prevalece
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment

laurelmarycecilia
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment

Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The false pope bergoglio is in control. He never succeeded to the Chair of St Peter which remains occupied by the idiotic and thoroughly confused so called "theologian" pope Benedict xvi.
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The real pope remains the frightful benedict xvi who has created this foul mess.
Remain in no doubt, the so called "pope francis" has no spiritual or material authority over any living roman catholic.
The 'B&B16' Duo The confusion that can be seen in the Roman Catholic church is not a crisis but an epochal breakthrough. The last papal decision of Benedict XVI led to the transformation of the Saint Peter's Office into a synodal two-headed hybrid. Actually he dissolved - by virtue of power given to him by Jesus Christ [Matt 16, 19] - the same office on Feb. 28, 2013 at 8 p.m. (CET), so no he may …More
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Pope Benedict xvi has no power to dissolve the papacy or to alter its fundamental strucure.
He may have attempted that but he remains the pope due to serious flaws in his so called abdication speech.
Remember Pope Benedict is a highly overated theologian filled with much modernist nonsense and an exaggerated confidence.
I may be wrong about him and hope that I am .There are other darker reasons at …More
He may have attempted that but he remains the pope due to serious flaws in his so called abdication speech.
Remember Pope Benedict is a highly overated theologian filled with much modernist nonsense and an exaggerated confidence.
I may be wrong about him and hope that I am .There are other darker reasons at work in this entire papal debacle.
The bottom line for me is that the chair of St Peter continues to be occupied by pope B enedict.
Bergoglio is not now and never has been a pope of any kind, therefore judging him is rather all too easy.
But he needs to be got rid of asap.
De Profundis
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
HerzMariae
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thors Catholic Hammer
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
He is a destroyer surrounded by homosexual advisors ,population control experts and other enemies of the human race