"Here is a partial translation of the declaration that I made with the help of Google I begin with par 8, because that was were the most important part of the document begins; I will see if I have time to go back and translate the beginning.
Quote
Par. 8: This dramatic attitude (diffusion of revolutionary principles) of the Ecclesial authorities, results without a doubt in the faithful being placed in the state of necessity. In effect, there is not only a “grave inconvenience” but, even more, a real danger of placing one’s own salvation in the hands of pastors imbued with this “adulterous” spirit, which is harmful not only to the faith but also to morals. We do not have any other choice but to protect ourselves from such an authority, because “it is in a permanent state of constant incoherence and contradiction”, and that, “while this doubtfulness is not dissipated, the disasters will be multiplied in the Church” (Msgr. Lefebvre, Le Coup Maitre de Satan, Editions Saint Gabriel, 1977, pg. 5-6). We live in circumstances where true obedience requires us to disobey (Msgr. Lefebvre). For it is better to obey God rather than men (acts 5.29).
Also, as long as this equivocation of the Church authorities is not cleared up, the the state of grave inconvenience foreseen by canon 1098 will also persists; and therefore the celebration of marriages according to the extra-ordinary form (i.e. not using the regular parish priest to officiate at weddings).
In addition, since marriage like any other sacrament, implies a profession of faith; one cannot allow our faithful to have recourse to a minister who habitually orients his ministry in the adulterous direction of Vatican II. Especially since they have the possibility of using a priest free from this prevarication of the faith.
In light of the above principles, the true nature of the Roman document can be seen. Persisting in the disastrous course of Vatican II: The Roman authorities are attempting to simply deprive the faithful the possibility of having recourse to the extraordinary form of marriage (follows a quote from the Roman document).....apart from the fact that such a measure is just as unjust as it is null, it is also a violation of the spirit of the law. The Ecclesia Dei Commission has allowed that which is in effect the new code of canon law forbids, that is to place the extraordinary form of marriage under the control of the ordinary; and this at the expense of the natural right to marriage.
So long as this dramatic state of the Church lasts, and the destructive equivocation in which the highest authorities of the Church live, we shall continue to use the extraordinary form of marriage without letting it be unduly governed by the ordinary. We will therefore continue to validly and lawfully celebrate our marriages in our churches and chapels, as we have always done before, referring for this to the canons 1098 of the old code and 1116 of the new, independently of any prior agreement with the local bishop.
To those who would object that such a practice would henceforth be invalid since the ecclesiastical authorities offer a possible delegation of the local bishop, we will reply that the state of necessity which legitimizes our way of doing things is not canonical but dogmatic, The impossibility of resorting to the authorities in place is not physical but moral. We simply do not want to abandon souls who, driven by circumstances, entrust themselves to our ministry. They did not flee from the prevaricating authorities, so that these same would again be imposed on them during one of the most important ceremonies of their lives.
Moreover, those who make such an objection show that they know very little about the right of the Church, which thinks conversely. In fact, it allows the faithful to voluntarily place themselves in the case of necessity in order to contract validly and lawfully a marriage according to the extraordinary form, even if they have the possibility of doing otherwise. [10]
For the sake of the sacrament of marriage, for the good of your families, for the good of your souls, we do not intend to subject the cause of your marriages to an ecclesiastical jurisdiction whose courts declare invalid, marriages that are certainly valid, Under the false reason of the lack of psychological maturity of the contracting parties . We also know how much these same tribunals effectively endorse Catholic divorce through the simplified procedure of nullity of marriage promulgated by Pope Francis. This is why we will continue to recognize as ultimate judge of these matters only the Commission of Saint Charles Borromeo, which the Society of St. Pius X had to establish precisely because of these invalid declarations of nullity.
Finally, let us express our great astonishment about this Roman decision and the echo it received. The personal prelature given to the Society of St. Pius X was supposed to recognize us as we are, and to preserve our independence from the local bishops. But the first decisions taken were to unjustly subject our marriages to these same bishops; before conditioning opening any of our new houses to their approval tomorrow. This is an example of how the duplicity of language reigns not only in the domain of faith and morality, but also in these canonical questions.
Therefore, in this centenary year of the apparitions of Fatima, we invoke the Immaculate Heart of Mary not in order to put an end to our canonical situation, which is considered by some to be irregular, but to free the Church from its modernist occupation and that the Higher authorities return to the path followed by the Church until Vatican II. It is then that our bishops can put their episcopate back into the hands of the Sovereign Pontiff. (12) (Mgr Lefebvre, Déclaration publique à l’occasion de la consécration épiscopale de plusieurs prêtres de la FSSPX, in Fideliter, hors série des 29 et 30 juin 1988."
www.suscipedomine.com/forum/index.php
