Even Catholic murderers (abortion) receive Communion.

Some innocent Catholic wives can not receive Communion nor Confession because of non-Catholic husbands, eventually become lapsed. Despite their first marriage since most young Catholics are women in Korea. This is exactly Sacraments Weapon.

Non-Catholic spouse's 'Promise and Signature' is required for the Marriage Dispensation only in Korea.
Those Non Catholics say 'It's against the Korean constitution and Catholic Church is self-righteous unlike Buddhism.

Putting Francis in perspective, nothing Pope Francis' has done is comparable to the enormity of Vatican II and the loss of Catholics directly resulting from it. @Deacon Nick Donnelly

For decades, previous Popes have "moved" the Church away from its established teachings. Catholics fell away in droves, some to heresy, others to literal apostasy. Much of the "New Age" movement today owes its numbers to former Catholics seeking a religion to replace the Church.

GTV user F M Shyanguya recently quoted an Italian proverb that a fish starts rotting at the head. The "head" of the Church (in the cerebral sense) is formed by the theological minds comprising it.

Previous popes did their worst damage rotting the mind of the Church, through creative reinterpretations of theology and doctrine. The results of their efforts weren't immediately visible or even news-worthy. Pope So 'n So wrote "x" in his an encyclical. Pope Such 'n Such (notably the ever-voluble Benedict) published another book on man's relationship with God writing... "y".

Most of the laity never read those works, but the clergy did, particularly the decision-making intelligensia within the Vatican. That's where the rot started and that's how the rot fostered an ideological shift that led to Francis' election as Pope.

By contrast, Francis' errors in faith are simply more accessible and understandable to the common man. They directly address the issues of the world instead of the way the Church should perceive and respond to that world.

In a way, this is a good thing. Pope Francis' errors are immediately and instantly recognizable as such. The sort quietly introduced by John Paul II and Benedict XVI through their scholarship both before an after becoming Pope are far more insidious.

By contrast, Francis' errors are simply more accessible and understandable to the common man. They're not on a whole new level of horrifying because, and echoes my first comment, faithful traditionally-minded Catholics are already used to decades of Papal error.

Frankly, I'm more concerned about the markedly vindictive, albeit hopefully well-intentioned critics of Pope Francis tempting some of the faithful into the sin of schism. That Canon 212 guy has already openly advanced the heresy of conciliarism on GTV while branding himself just such a schismatic.

He isn't the only one. Many on GTV are, technically, no longer part of the Catholic Church. That isn't my opinion. Canon Law 751 is clear. "schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff " and Canon Law 1364.1 states, "an apostate from the faith, a heretic, or a schismatic incurs a latae sententiae excommunication".

They've fallen away, paradoxically, while still claiming they're part of "the true Church" which (shades of Martin Luther) is whatever they say it is.. Like all who exist outside the Church they seek to lure others in joining them in their error with constant misuse of emotionally loaded Catholic terms like "apostasy" and "heresy". Their claims and their usage simply aren't supported by the Catholic Church's definitions of the terms.

Francis may incite some weak-willed Catholics to leave the Church through apostasy. Many of his critics are encouraging the thoughtful, traditionally-minded Catholics to leave the Church through schism -without even knowing they've done so.

One doesn't combat an error by introducing another one that ultimately produces the same disastrous result..