Catholic Archbishop Chaput Replaced By Modernist Francis Partisan

Still on with this crypto sedevacantist nonsense I see.
You have failed monumentally to display a single formal doctrinal heresy made by any of these popes whilst in office that you list.
The alleged "pope" Bergoglio on the other hand has made several doctrinal heresies.
This means he can not be a pope even were he validly elected which is extremely doubtful in itself.
WHEN IS THE PENNY GOING TO DROP.?

"Still on with this crypto sedevacantist nonsense I see."

No, you don't "see". I'm not a crypto-sedevacantist. I've repeatedly said as much and you're simply choosing, at this point, to flat-out lie when you claim otherwise.

You're a liar, Thor.

"You have failed monumentally to display a single formal doctrinal heresy made by any of these popes whilst in office that you list."

Oh really? Explain why, to this day you have never once disproven any of the charges of heresy others have presented. And there are a LOT of charges.

Remember, also, you must disprove ALL of them if you wanted to clear a Pope of the accusation. Instead, you've disproven NONE of them.

I've posted that long list of critical web-sites enough times by now that it's obvious you're unable or unwilling to refute them.

Instead, your strategy is just to make "canonical-sounding" accusations and then to go on repeating them as if you've somehow proven their validity. What you're doing is not even sound debating as much as third-rate rhetoric.

"The alleged "pope" Bergoglio on the other hand has made several doctrinal heresies. This means he can not be a pope even were he validly elected which is extremely doubtful in itself."

...and again, the same can be said for Benedict XVI and his predecessors.

They too have advanced doctrinal heresies. You've seen the list and you continue to ignore it. When is that "penny going to drop"?

In your case, probably never. You don't care about Canon Law or Church Magisterium except when it suits you. If the previous popes contradicted both, it obviously doesn't bother you in the slightest.

One? I have linked entire web-pages FILLED with them.

And... again. This doesn't come down to one, just one "doctrinal heresy". You must disprove ALL of them for EACH Pope. You're in for a real tough time with the quiet, scholarly, and voluminous authorship of Benedict XVI. His critics had a field-day with his books.

Oh, I understand your reasoning here. You want to re-argue those heresies with me, instead of refuting those you recognize are better versed on the subject than yourself!

I am not your opponent, Thor. Your opponent is the truth. Your opponent is the most accurate and effective presentation of the truth available. And you fail. I know you've looked over "all the lists I like" and you've been avoiding them ever since. You don't -like- what's on those pages. Too bad.

You want me to re-argue every case for over half a century of papacies. Why on earth would I do something silly like that? The work is already done and, as we both see, done very well.

If you wish to claim that the last four papacies were entirely free of "doctrinal heresy" then disproving each and every accusation made is YOUR job.

Perhaps you need a refresher in how debating works, Thor.

I made a claim and you challenged it.

I have supplied numerous sites detailing extensive evidence in support of that claim.

You have done nothing to refute that evidence.

It is YOUR job to refute and disprove the evidence presented. All of it, for each pope listed, if you are to refute my claim.

Loudly demanding that I re-state the evidence and bold claims you can disprove that re-statement is not a valid answer.

The evidence has already been presented.

It's been presented, repeatedly for quite some time now.

This is just another deflection on your part, another way for you to avoid doing what you should. i.e. refuting the evidence I presented in support of my claim.

If you can't or if you won't then your challenge fails, and my claim stands unrefuted.

Get crackin', Thor. :D You have a lot of work ahead of you. Over half a century's worth.