Gloria.TV News on the 18th of November 2016 Intended Confusion: We should not be surprised that Pope Francis has declined the request of four Cardinals for clarification of Amoris Laetitia, writes the …More
Gloria.TV News on the 18th of November 2016
Intended Confusion: We should not be surprised that Pope Francis has declined the request of four Cardinals for clarification of Amoris Laetitia, writes the Catholic journalist, Phil Lawler. Quote: “Are faithful Catholics confused by that document? Absolutely. That is the Holy Father’s intent. The confusion is not a bug; it’s a feature.”
Contradictory Progress: Radical Cardinal Walter Kasper, a close adviser of Pope Francis, said introducing a concert in Trent, Italy, that the German heretic Martin Luther has been – quote – “demonized” for centuries. But now he is seen as a – quote - “religious man,” a “witness to Christ who did not want to build a Reformed Church, but rather start a reformation, an evangelical renewal of the whole Church.” Kasper called this contradiction a – quote – “progress.”
Scorched Earth: Francis’ action against the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate has generated disastrous results, writes Riposte-catholique. Fifteen …More
Intended Confusion: We should not be surprised that Pope Francis has declined the request of four Cardinals for clarification of Amoris Laetitia, writes the Catholic journalist, Phil Lawler. Quote: “Are faithful Catholics confused by that document? Absolutely. That is the Holy Father’s intent. The confusion is not a bug; it’s a feature.”
Contradictory Progress: Radical Cardinal Walter Kasper, a close adviser of Pope Francis, said introducing a concert in Trent, Italy, that the German heretic Martin Luther has been – quote – “demonized” for centuries. But now he is seen as a – quote - “religious man,” a “witness to Christ who did not want to build a Reformed Church, but rather start a reformation, an evangelical renewal of the whole Church.” Kasper called this contradiction a – quote – “progress.”
Scorched Earth: Francis’ action against the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate has generated disastrous results, writes Riposte-catholique. Fifteen …More
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
NOVEMBER 21, 2016
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüller were silent yesterday on the feast of Christ the King
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüllerwere silent yesterday on the feast of Christ the King.Due to a doctrinal change in traditional salvation theology there is no more an ecumenism of return, there is no …More
NOVEMBER 21, 2016
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüller were silent yesterday on the feast of Christ the King
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüllerwere silent yesterday on the feast of Christ the King.Due to a doctrinal change in traditional salvation theology there is no more an ecumenism of return, there is no more the necessity for non Christians to be incorporated into the Church for salvation and no Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
They objected to subjectivism in Amoris Laetitia and moral theology but ignore their own subjectivism in the interpretation of salvation theology.
When Pope Francis reportedly responded to their dubia and cited Vatican Council II he was interpreting Vatican Council II with the same subjectivism.
The four cardinals assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.Pope Francis does the same when he interprets Vatican Council II.
The four cardinals have in principle accepted that hypothetical cases can be non hypothetical but explicit and this is how they see Vatican Council II. This is non traditional and irrational.If they can accept this then why cannot Pope Francis break with tradition in his interpretation of Vatican Council II, moral theology and salvation theology?
Before the first Synod Cardinal Kasper said clearly that if ecclesiology can be changed in the Church then why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried.He is correct in the sense that ecclesiology has been changed with Vatican Council II.It was done in a stupid, crude way and they got away with it. They just assumed what was invisible was objective and no one in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith corrected the error. Even the traditionalists repeated the same nonsense. Traditional theology was replaced with fantasy theology.
Ecclesiology was changed when hypothetical and invisible cases were considered visible and personally known.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were postulated to be known in personal cases, visible and all without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So they then inferred that these cases were known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II being visible and known was a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition. So there was now known salvation outside the Church. This was a new doctrine. The old ecclesiology based on Feeneyite EENS was buried.
So Pope Francis is referring to this new ecclesiology in Vatican Council II which comes from mixing up subjectivity with objectivity, invisiblity with being visible.And no one complains. No one says that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with invisible cases just being invisible and so then there is no clash with the old ecclesiology.
And if there is no clash with the old ecclesiology then on the feast of Christ the King we can once again affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. This is a priority since outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation, there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and so all need to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation.This must be expressed in political and social legisalation for the common good.
But the four cardinals did not say this.
They have restricted themselves to only moral theology.
Pope Francis responded with the traditional error and deception on Vatican Council II and no one pointed out the objective error in Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Raymond Burke has said that Amoris Laetitia cannot be magisterial since there is confusion and ambiguity. What about Vatican Council II? Why does the Council mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with reference to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the need for 'faith and baptism' for all for salvation.(AG 7, LG 14).The baptism of desire etc are invisible cases and have no relevance to all needing faith and baptism for salvation.They do not exist in our reality. They are 'zero cases' in the words of the apologist John Martignoni. They are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla says Fr. S.Visintin osb, Dean of Theology, Pontifical University of San Anselm, Rome.
But 'zero cases' are not 'zero cases' for the four cardinals.This is the new theology which has been accepted in principle. It is based on the irrational premise ( visible cases of the baptism of desire) and inference( visible baptism of desire is an explicit exception to Feeneyite EENS).Why do the four cardinal follow this new theology, the Rahnerian theology?
If they avoid this new theology and correct the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is there in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 then Pope Francis cannot cite Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and Cardinal Walter Kasper cannot cite Vatican Council II as the cause of a change in ecclesiology.
There is no change in ecclesiology without the irrational inference from the Fr. Leonard Feeney case in Boston.It was in 1949 Boston that the Church took a new theological route. It was irrational,non traditional and heretical.
It still is magisterial and accepted by all the cardinals.
-Lionel Andrades
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüller were silent yesterday on the feast of Christ the King
Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüllerwere silent yesterday on the feast of Christ the King.Due to a doctrinal change in traditional salvation theology there is no more an ecumenism of return, there is no more the necessity for non Christians to be incorporated into the Church for salvation and no Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.
They objected to subjectivism in Amoris Laetitia and moral theology but ignore their own subjectivism in the interpretation of salvation theology.
When Pope Francis reportedly responded to their dubia and cited Vatican Council II he was interpreting Vatican Council II with the same subjectivism.
The four cardinals assume hypothetical cases are not hypothetical.Pope Francis does the same when he interprets Vatican Council II.
The four cardinals have in principle accepted that hypothetical cases can be non hypothetical but explicit and this is how they see Vatican Council II. This is non traditional and irrational.If they can accept this then why cannot Pope Francis break with tradition in his interpretation of Vatican Council II, moral theology and salvation theology?
Before the first Synod Cardinal Kasper said clearly that if ecclesiology can be changed in the Church then why cannot the Eucharist be given to the divorced and remarried.He is correct in the sense that ecclesiology has been changed with Vatican Council II.It was done in a stupid, crude way and they got away with it. They just assumed what was invisible was objective and no one in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith corrected the error. Even the traditionalists repeated the same nonsense. Traditional theology was replaced with fantasy theology.
Ecclesiology was changed when hypothetical and invisible cases were considered visible and personally known.The baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance were postulated to be known in personal cases, visible and all without the baptism of water in the Catholic Church. So they then inferred that these cases were known exceptions to the Feeneyite interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. So LG 16 etc in Vatican Council II being visible and known was a rupture with the Syllabus of Errors and the rest of Tradition. So there was now known salvation outside the Church. This was a new doctrine. The old ecclesiology based on Feeneyite EENS was buried.
So Pope Francis is referring to this new ecclesiology in Vatican Council II which comes from mixing up subjectivity with objectivity, invisiblity with being visible.And no one complains. No one says that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with invisible cases just being invisible and so then there is no clash with the old ecclesiology.
And if there is no clash with the old ecclesiology then on the feast of Christ the King we can once again affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. This is a priority since outside the Catholic Church there is no known salvation, there are no known cases of the baptism of desire and so all need to be incorporated into the Church as members for salvation.This must be expressed in political and social legisalation for the common good.
But the four cardinals did not say this.
They have restricted themselves to only moral theology.
Pope Francis responded with the traditional error and deception on Vatican Council II and no one pointed out the objective error in Vatican Council II.
Cardinal Raymond Burke has said that Amoris Laetitia cannot be magisterial since there is confusion and ambiguity. What about Vatican Council II? Why does the Council mention the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance with reference to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the need for 'faith and baptism' for all for salvation.(AG 7, LG 14).The baptism of desire etc are invisible cases and have no relevance to all needing faith and baptism for salvation.They do not exist in our reality. They are 'zero cases' in the words of the apologist John Martignoni. They are not exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla says Fr. S.Visintin osb, Dean of Theology, Pontifical University of San Anselm, Rome.
But 'zero cases' are not 'zero cases' for the four cardinals.This is the new theology which has been accepted in principle. It is based on the irrational premise ( visible cases of the baptism of desire) and inference( visible baptism of desire is an explicit exception to Feeneyite EENS).Why do the four cardinal follow this new theology, the Rahnerian theology?
If they avoid this new theology and correct the objective error in the Letter of the Holy Office 1949 which is there in Ad Gentes 7 and Lumen Gentium 14 then Pope Francis cannot cite Vatican Council II as a break with Tradition and Cardinal Walter Kasper cannot cite Vatican Council II as the cause of a change in ecclesiology.
There is no change in ecclesiology without the irrational inference from the Fr. Leonard Feeney case in Boston.It was in 1949 Boston that the Church took a new theological route. It was irrational,non traditional and heretical.
It still is magisterial and accepted by all the cardinals.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
INTENDED CONFUSION:
Monday, November 21, 2016
On the feast of Christ the King homilies were controlled and restricted by the Vatican with the approval of the political Left
On the feast of Christ the King yesterday,Sunday, homilies were controlled and restricted by the Vatican with the approval of the political Left. I did not hear any priest call for all political and social legislation to have …More
INTENDED CONFUSION:
Monday, November 21, 2016
On the feast of Christ the King homilies were controlled and restricted by the Vatican with the approval of the political Left
On the feast of Christ the King yesterday,Sunday, homilies were controlled and restricted by the Vatican with the approval of the political Left. I did not hear any priest call for all political and social legislation to have Christ the King as its centre. Instead the priests spoke vaguely about making Christ the king of our hearts and to know that his kingdom is within us.
Even the daily Avvenire, of the Catholics bishops conference mentioned the feast but projected social values, solidarity etc. They mentioned Quas Primas and other encylicals of the popes in a article tucked away in the inside pages of the daily newspaper.
Ecclesiastical masonry does not encourage Catholics voting for Catholic political parties which support the Soical Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. The cardinals and bishops too vote for the leftist or right wing political parties whose priorities are not the teachings of the Catholic Church on the Social Reign of Christ the King.
To protect their wordly interests under hostile leftist laws, the Catholic faith is not proclaimed and a new Gospel continues to be preached in the Catholic Church world wide.
Vatican Council II is not being interpreted in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is the basis of the traditional teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King and the importance of there not being a separation of Church and State.
Even the traditionalists who affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Quas Primas negate it with Rahnerian theology. This theology is based on invisible cases being invisible and so the conclusion is non traditional and irrational. This was the ruse used by ecclesiastical masonry to eliminate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old eccclesiology of the Church. So today the Traditional Latin Mass is offered with Rahnerian theology.It is the same with the Novus Ordo Mass. The priests who offer the Traditional Latin Mass will not affirm the old ecclesiology and reject Rahnerian theology.Since it would mean a loss of his career. The priest would be suspended by the Vatican with the approval of the Jewish Left rabbis.So presently homilies are mild and politically correct all over the world.
-Lionel Andrades
Monday, November 21, 2016
On the feast of Christ the King homilies were controlled and restricted by the Vatican with the approval of the political Left
On the feast of Christ the King yesterday,Sunday, homilies were controlled and restricted by the Vatican with the approval of the political Left. I did not hear any priest call for all political and social legislation to have Christ the King as its centre. Instead the priests spoke vaguely about making Christ the king of our hearts and to know that his kingdom is within us.
Even the daily Avvenire, of the Catholics bishops conference mentioned the feast but projected social values, solidarity etc. They mentioned Quas Primas and other encylicals of the popes in a article tucked away in the inside pages of the daily newspaper.
Ecclesiastical masonry does not encourage Catholics voting for Catholic political parties which support the Soical Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation. The cardinals and bishops too vote for the leftist or right wing political parties whose priorities are not the teachings of the Catholic Church on the Social Reign of Christ the King.
To protect their wordly interests under hostile leftist laws, the Catholic faith is not proclaimed and a new Gospel continues to be preached in the Catholic Church world wide.
Vatican Council II is not being interpreted in harmony with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is the basis of the traditional teaching on the Social Reign of Christ the King and the importance of there not being a separation of Church and State.
Even the traditionalists who affirm the Social Reign of Christ the King based on Quas Primas negate it with Rahnerian theology. This theology is based on invisible cases being invisible and so the conclusion is non traditional and irrational. This was the ruse used by ecclesiastical masonry to eliminate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the old eccclesiology of the Church. So today the Traditional Latin Mass is offered with Rahnerian theology.It is the same with the Novus Ordo Mass. The priests who offer the Traditional Latin Mass will not affirm the old ecclesiology and reject Rahnerian theology.Since it would mean a loss of his career. The priest would be suspended by the Vatican with the approval of the Jewish Left rabbis.So presently homilies are mild and politically correct all over the world.
-Lionel Andrades
I heard Fr Fehlner preach a few years when I visited the Marina Shrine in LaCrossse, Wi. It was excellent.
And Fr Angelo Geiger is a good man. Both went to the Vatican with legimate concerns, and Cardinal Braz de Aviz took advantage of the situation to gut the FFI.More
I heard Fr Fehlner preach a few years when I visited the Marina Shrine in LaCrossse, Wi. It was excellent.
And Fr Angelo Geiger is a good man. Both went to the Vatican with legimate concerns, and Cardinal Braz de Aviz took advantage of the situation to gut the FFI.
And Fr Angelo Geiger is a good man. Both went to the Vatican with legimate concerns, and Cardinal Braz de Aviz took advantage of the situation to gut the FFI.
Lionel L. Andrades
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
the battle to push out the smoke of Satan now in the church?
Lionel:
They are still part of the problem in Italy.
NOVEMBER 19, 2016
On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for …More
the battle to push out the smoke of Satan now in the church?
Lionel:
They are still part of the problem in Italy.
NOVEMBER 19, 2016
On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for secular political organisations.
On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for secular political organisations.
They do not believe that Jesus Christ as known in the Catholic Church must be at the centre of all political and social legislation.
They do not believe that all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation(Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7).So to avoid the fires of Hell all need to formally enter the Church,is not more the priority in social and political legislation. Even the popes, cardinals and bishops do not believe in this any more. This is why in Italy the majority of Catholics vote for political parites like the Partito Democratico, Alleanza Nationale etc which do notsupport the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Instead the popes and cardinals have accepted the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger which suggests that there is known salvation outside the Church.This is their view even though there is no known salvation, practically known, outside the Church. Neither has any one in the past seen personally someone saved outside the Church.
Yet this is how Vatican Council II is interpreted. Since there is known salvation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water, there is no more the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since the dogma on exclusive salvation does not practically exist any more there is no more an ecumenism of return.
Since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church it is not necessary that the Social Reign of Christ the King be a priority for the popes and Catholics. People are saved in their religions even if they are not Catholic.
This Rahnerian theology is also accepted by the SSPX and the other traditionalists.
So Catholics today do not feel obligated, in Italy for example, to vote for Militia Christi or Forza Nuova.
-Lionel Andrades
Lionel:
They are still part of the problem in Italy.
NOVEMBER 19, 2016
On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for secular political organisations.
On the feast of Christ the King we see that the majority of Catholic lay people and religious including ecclesiastics do not vote for Catholic political parties which support the Social Reign of Christ the King over all political legislation.Instead they vote for secular political organisations.
They do not believe that Jesus Christ as known in the Catholic Church must be at the centre of all political and social legislation.
They do not believe that all need 'faith and baptism' for salvation(Vatican Council II, Ad Gentes 7).So to avoid the fires of Hell all need to formally enter the Church,is not more the priority in social and political legislation. Even the popes, cardinals and bishops do not believe in this any more. This is why in Italy the majority of Catholics vote for political parites like the Partito Democratico, Alleanza Nationale etc which do notsupport the Social Reign of Christ the King.
Instead the popes and cardinals have accepted the New Theology of Rahner and Ratzinger which suggests that there is known salvation outside the Church.This is their view even though there is no known salvation, practically known, outside the Church. Neither has any one in the past seen personally someone saved outside the Church.
Yet this is how Vatican Council II is interpreted. Since there is known salvation of the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance without the baptism of water, there is no more the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. Since the dogma on exclusive salvation does not practically exist any more there is no more an ecumenism of return.
Since there is alleged known salvation outside the Church it is not necessary that the Social Reign of Christ the King be a priority for the popes and Catholics. People are saved in their religions even if they are not Catholic.
This Rahnerian theology is also accepted by the SSPX and the other traditionalists.
So Catholics today do not feel obligated, in Italy for example, to vote for Militia Christi or Forza Nuova.
-Lionel Andrades
GTVisrockin
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thank God for Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüller. St Micheal defend them in this battle, the battle to save souls, the battle to push out the smoke of Satan now in the church. All who truly love the lord should be praying for these Holy men, for their battle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers. Placing them in the …More
Thank God for Cardinals Raymond Burke, Carlo Cafarra, Joachim Meisner and Walter Brandmüller. St Micheal defend them in this battle, the battle to save souls, the battle to push out the smoke of Satan now in the church. All who truly love the lord should be praying for these Holy men, for their battle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers. Placing them in the immaculate heart of Mary, for it is Mary through her Son that will crush the serpent's head.
rhemes1582
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thanks for the news Gloria.TV
Martin Luther demonized for centuries.........In Hell ; yes then that would be an accurate description.
What a beautiful moment in time the FFI gave to God, and His Church.
from Canticle of Zachary;
That delivered from the hand of our enemies, we should serve him without fear, in holiness and justice before Him all our days.
May almighty God reward His faithful children.More
Thanks for the news Gloria.TV
Martin Luther demonized for centuries.........In Hell ; yes then that would be an accurate description.
What a beautiful moment in time the FFI gave to God, and His Church.
from Canticle of Zachary;
That delivered from the hand of our enemies, we should serve him without fear, in holiness and justice before Him all our days.
May almighty God reward His faithful children.
Martin Luther demonized for centuries.........In Hell ; yes then that would be an accurate description.
What a beautiful moment in time the FFI gave to God, and His Church.
from Canticle of Zachary;
That delivered from the hand of our enemies, we should serve him without fear, in holiness and justice before Him all our days.
May almighty God reward His faithful children.
AveMaria44
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Le refus de clarifier ses positions et l'emploi d'un délinquant sexuel musulman pour le service de l'autel devraient ouvrir les yeux des aveugles.
Holy Cannoli
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Cardinal Walter Kasper: Luther was “religious man,” a “witness to Christ who did not want to build a Reformed Church, but rather start a reformation, an evangelical renewal of the whole Church.” Kasper called this contradiction a – quote – “progress.”
Kasper is simply pimping his new book, An Ecumenical Perspective, which will be released in January 2017. 
You can bet that none of the …More
Cardinal Walter Kasper: Luther was “religious man,” a “witness to Christ who did not want to build a Reformed Church, but rather start a reformation, an evangelical renewal of the whole Church.” Kasper called this contradiction a – quote – “progress.”
Kasper is simply pimping his new book, An Ecumenical Perspective, which will be released in January 2017.
You can bet that none of the following Luther quotes will be included in Cdl Kasper's book.
An example:
Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tell’s us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.
Kasper is simply pimping his new book, An Ecumenical Perspective, which will be released in January 2017.
You can bet that none of the following Luther quotes will be included in Cdl Kasper's book.
An example:
Christ committed adultery first of all with the women at the well about whom St. John tell’s us. Was not everybody about Him saying: ‘Whatever has He been doing with her?’ Secondly, with Mary Magdalen, and thirdly with the women taken in adultery whom He dismissed so lightly. Thus even, Christ who was so righteous, must have been guilty of fornication before He died.
Stationsquare.ml
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Since PF despises the TLM, his "Reform"(Destruction) of The Franciscan Friars of The Immaculate, has sent a Signal that this Papacy is one of Destruction.
Sadly, the Novus Ordo Only Catholics(NeoCats), who are utterly clueless, are too busy with head in sand to notice and keep calling PF "A Nice Man."More
Since PF despises the TLM, his "Reform"(Destruction) of The Franciscan Friars of The Immaculate, has sent a Signal that this Papacy is one of Destruction.
Sadly, the Novus Ordo Only Catholics(NeoCats), who are utterly clueless, are too busy with head in sand to notice and keep calling PF "A Nice Man."
Sadly, the Novus Ordo Only Catholics(NeoCats), who are utterly clueless, are too busy with head in sand to notice and keep calling PF "A Nice Man."
AveMaria44
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
"Kasper called this contradiction a – quote – “progress.”" Se réconcilier avec l'erreur sans que celle-ci se corrige est un progrès, un progrès dans l'apostasie.