en.news
163K

Francis, the Dictator, Feels “Under Siege”

Everything is up in the air, as it has been throughout Francis' pontificate, Specola (InfoVaticana.com, January 18) writes.

According to Specola, this shows that Francis feels “under siege” – he doesn’t want anyone to know what he is doing, so, in the “Synodal Church” all decisions are taken by Francis alone while Francis is pretending the contrary.

To hide his decisions, Francis appoints commissions with no intention to respect the outcome, so Specola. When the controversies centred around finances, he created two commission (Vatican Bank and the Vatican’s economic-administrative system). Their secret results which were partially leaked have been forgotten.

The commission on a female diaconate came up with an “no.” But faced with new pressure from oligarch media Francis simply set up a second commission.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith clarified – with Francis’ blessing – that homosex couples cannot be “blessed.” After criticism, Francis played "homosex friendly" presenting himself as victim of “conservative tendencies.”

Picture: © Mazur/catholicnews.org.uk, CC BY-NC-ND, #newsKekgqffeab

가입을 원합니다
Angelo Santelli's comment : Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?
// 'The Third Secret of Fatima is that Satan would enter into the Church' is why ?
Fr. Pual Kramer said that The secret of Fatima warns against the New Mass and foretells the Second Vatican Council as an "evil council". Cardinal Ratzinger told this to Fr. Ingo Döllinger, and to another …More
Angelo Santelli's comment : Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?
// 'The Third Secret of Fatima is that Satan would enter into the Church' is why ?

Fr. Pual Kramer said that The secret of Fatima warns against the New Mass and foretells the Second Vatican Council as an "evil council". Cardinal Ratzinger told this to Fr. Ingo Döllinger, and to another priest whose name I am not at liberty to reveal. The Introduction to the first volume of my latest work proves that it is revealed in the secret of Fatima that Bergoglio's reforms will cause the great apostasy foretold by St. Paul in 2 Thessalonians.

" Earlier or later checkmating his opponent and anti- church would backfire on his maneuver. One who studied by engaging reason and willingness may always be enlightened with God's grace and be invited to pray for true Successor of Peter , that is living pope Bendict XVI. Then over time all the pieces of the puzzle fit showing clear and logical picture of a simple situation which sinful and modern man has tendency to complicate, in contrary to God's simplicity."
Ultraviolet
"You keep saying canon law says you can judge the pope, but I don’t see it anywhere in there." @Mathathias Maccabeus Wait your turn, please. :)
I've been waiting since Jan. 14 for @Les Crispi to quote where "Jesus Christ told us how to define heresy." If He did, and since Jimmy takes such pride in his Novus Ordo Catholicism, then it should be an easy thing to quote Jesus Christ erbatim. A proper …More
"You keep saying canon law says you can judge the pope, but I don’t see it anywhere in there." @Mathathias Maccabeus Wait your turn, please. :)

I've been waiting since Jan. 14 for @Les Crispi to quote where "Jesus Christ told us how to define heresy." If He did, and since Jimmy takes such pride in his Novus Ordo Catholicism, then it should be an easy thing to quote Jesus Christ erbatim. A proper citation would be lovely, too... Book, Chapter, Verse.

"I've already posted Bergoglio's heresies."

...and I've already pointed out you don't have the authority to declare them "heresies" by the standards of heresy used by The Catholic Church.

"Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority...

You aren't quoting Jesus Christ. Witness Jan. 14 up above. You aren't quoting Canon Law. Witness your comments here.

...and Galatians 1:8-9 doesn't support you either. Jesus condemns anyone who would write a false "gospel" account of Jesus' life and His teachings. There is no "Gospel of Francis" so this cite is ireelevant.

"You believe..."
Jimmy the Mind Reader. One of your standard tactics: claiming what other people "believe" what the "think" and so on.

However, you argue Benedict XVI supposedly still is Pope even in spite of a long list of supposed "heresies", even against the dogma you supposedly champion. The Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is Catholic dogma. According to his critics, Benedict XVI denied that.

Supposed "heresies" don't bother you. Francis bothers you, and that's how hypocrisy works.

"Canon Law 751 defines heresy. And there's no doubt Bergoglio is obstinate."

Wrong. That isn't how "obstinate" works in Canon Law 751.

Canon Law 751 states "Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt."

"Obstinate" shows a deliberate course of action in the face of correction, i.e. "stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion."

Citation (Merriam-Webster dictionary entry: "Obstinate")

An obstinate denial or an obstinate doubt shows that:

a.) the accused heretic has expressed a view
b.) The Church has disgreed with that view as contrary to its teachings.
c.) The Church has attempted to correct the accused heretic
d.) the accused heretic has opposed that correction by the Church.

Regarding Pope Francis,
a.) He has certainly expressed his views.
b.)-d.) have not.

Who has the temporal authority to represent The Church in correcting the supposed errors of the Church's highest temporal authority?

"Bergoglio's own quotes indict him for heresy. Pretty simple."

Not according to Canon Law 751. Also, if you truly followed your standard honestly, you would argue the same for Benedict XVI based on the examples provided above. You don't because it's just a talking point for you.
Ultraviolet
"If I am wrong, and am a blasphemer, then that's my problem."
No, Jimmy... It's a problem for all faithful when you try to convince Catholics to adopt your Lutheran approach to Catholicism.
"You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness."
The irony of this coming from you, Jimmy. Good Heavens. :D
"You have an aversion to the truth."
See …More
"If I am wrong, and am a blasphemer, then that's my problem."
No, Jimmy... It's a problem for all faithful when you try to convince Catholics to adopt your Lutheran approach to Catholicism.

"You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness."

The irony of this coming from you, Jimmy. Good Heavens. :D

"You have an aversion to the truth."

See my last point. You can't defend your position factually. Rhetoric is not evidence.
Ultraviolet
Classic Marxist "victimhood" ploy. Leftists alway cry out in pain when striking others. Common trick they pull outside of abortion clinics, too.
Les Crispi
If he's really on the verge of dying, he needs to be getting his house in order. He should admit his heresy to Jesus Christ, then to the Church, ask for His forgiveness, and resign and live out the rest of his days in penance.
Ultraviolet
"He should admit his heresy to Jesus Christ..." He isn't a heretic until The Church condemns him as one. Until The Church does so, you should admit your calumny of the man to Jesus Christ as well
Les Crispi
I've already posted Bergoglio's heresies. Truth is infallible. Truth is always infallible. So when Bergoglio denies the immaculate conception, the incarnation, the existence of hell, etc., he speaks against Christian Truth. That is heresy.
Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority. Galatians 1:8-9 .
You believe a man who denies Jesus Christ is the Pope. You believe a man who denies …More
I've already posted Bergoglio's heresies. Truth is infallible. Truth is always infallible. So when Bergoglio denies the immaculate conception, the incarnation, the existence of hell, etc., he speaks against Christian Truth. That is heresy.

Jesus Christ and his words and Canon Law, are my authority. Galatians 1:8-9 .

You believe a man who denies Jesus Christ is the Pope. You believe a man who denies God's plan of salvation is the Pope. You believe a man who doesn't even believe in the Eucharist is the Pope.

Maybe I'm a blasphemer in your church. But I am Catholic, I believe in Jesus and I believe in his Truth. Peter did too. Bergoglio is not Peter.
Les Crispi
I've already posted Bergoglio's homily in Colombia. I'm not google. Do it yourself.
You can easily find his quotes. You don't want to.
Canon Law 751 defines heresy. And there's no doubt Bergoglio is obstinate.
Bergoglio's own quotes indict him for heresy. Pretty simple. ANd, since he has refused to answer the dubia or , more recently, a formal delict of heresy, he is, ahem, a heretic.
I'm amused …More
I've already posted Bergoglio's homily in Colombia. I'm not google. Do it yourself.

You can easily find his quotes. You don't want to.

Canon Law 751 defines heresy. And there's no doubt Bergoglio is obstinate.

Bergoglio's own quotes indict him for heresy. Pretty simple. ANd, since he has refused to answer the dubia or , more recently, a formal delict of heresy, he is, ahem, a heretic.

I'm amused you are so defensive about this. If I am wrong, and am a blasphemer, then that's my problem. But what if you're wrong? Seems like you're losing your mind over that:

You're not bothered at all that you call a man who enthroned a demon into the Vatican "Peter".

How Catholic.
2 more comments from Les Crispi
Les Crispi
You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness.
I'm explaining how we got "stuck" with Bergoglio, but for whatever pride and fear you have, you won't accept it.
If the Truth makes your fill your pants, don't read what I write. Ok? Good.More
You've not proven anything, except your affiliation with heresy, your cowardice, and your childishness.

I'm explaining how we got "stuck" with Bergoglio, but for whatever pride and fear you have, you won't accept it.

If the Truth makes your fill your pants, don't read what I write. Ok? Good.
Les Crispi
If you had an aversion to my "lies" you would be proving them lies. But instead you resort to toddler-level mockery. You have an aversion to the truth. Anyway, I hope you give really good, sincere confessions.
Angelo Santelli
I read this twaddle. My reply is, No the Church needs to get rid of Jorge Bergoglio.
Read Jon Allen's THE POPE WHO QUIT. Learn how many past Popes and hierarchy were beaten (figuratively or literally) by the RC faithful. Back in the Middle Ages of Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Scotus the faithful tolerated nothing from the hierarchy and frquently applied physical means to brng them back in line with …More
I read this twaddle. My reply is, No the Church needs to get rid of Jorge Bergoglio.

Read Jon Allen's THE POPE WHO QUIT. Learn how many past Popes and hierarchy were beaten (figuratively or literally) by the RC faithful. Back in the Middle Ages of Bonaventure, Aquinas, and Scotus the faithful tolerated nothing from the hierarchy and frquently applied physical means to brng them back in line with the teachings of the Apsotles. Some of those means were indeed life threatening.
Ultraviolet
"No the Church needs to get rid of Jorge Bergoglio." Please be a darling and name which temporal authority has the temporal authority to "get rid of" the highest temporal authority in The Catholic Church. I'll wait.
Jan Joseph
Paus Franciscus is een geboren oplichter.
Prayhard
Honestly I cannot see how that was worse than the Grassi or immediately after the Inzoli case.
Angelo Santelli
Former pope Benedict accused of misconduct over four sex abuse cases
Ratzinger failed to take action against priests in four cases of alleged sexual abuse in his diocese while Archbishop of Munich, bombshell report says
Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?More
Former pope Benedict accused of misconduct over four sex abuse cases

Ratzinger failed to take action against priests in four cases of alleged sexual abuse in his diocese while Archbishop of Munich, bombshell report says

Is this why he "abdicated"? Did Bergoglio and his tribe use this to force him out?
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
No, Bergoglio and his thugs (Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, SJ, Cardinals Danneels, Murphy-Occonor, Sodano, Silvestrini, McCarrick, and others forced Benedict XVI out much because of "Summorum Pontificum" and the explosion of new TLM sites around the world, new religious Orders, monasteries, cloisters, and also that Benedict XVI dressed, acted, and spoke like real Pope, like the ones pre-Vatican II …More
No, Bergoglio and his thugs (Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini, SJ, Cardinals Danneels, Murphy-Occonor, Sodano, Silvestrini, McCarrick, and others forced Benedict XVI out much because of "Summorum Pontificum" and the explosion of new TLM sites around the world, new religious Orders, monasteries, cloisters, and also that Benedict XVI dressed, acted, and spoke like real Pope, like the ones pre-Vatican II...even though he still supported Vatican II. Liturgically and otherwise, Benedict XVI was restoring the Church...which this gang hated. That's why they forced him out.