An impostor A heretic who was fraudulently elected Pope has no rights or privileges that a legitimate Pope has.
Just as a man cannot become a woman, neither can a heretic become a pope.

Bergoglio was disqualified from became a pope due to his heretical, apostate and schismatic past in Argentina.

1. The case of St. Catherine of Siena shows us how even a Catholic woman has the right to judge who was the legitimate pope.

2. That the history of the Church shows us that there have been several very famous antipopes who have usurped the chair of Peter even with the support of the cardinals and the government. Like the case of Anacletus II. So history shows us that we are not facing a unique case but that the antipopes who have usurped the papacy illicitly for many years have been judged and deposed by the Church in a particular way. So the invalidity in the case of the heresiarch Jorge Bergoglio must begin with his heretical and apostate background in Argentina, which demonstrates his invalidity even as a candidate for the papacy because Bergoglio was already an apostate in Argentina, a schismatic and a heretic who had defied the Divine Natural Law and the Catholic moral teachings of the Church to support gay adoptions, pseudo gay civil marriages, sex change. It is known that he is a Freemason who gave his name to Freemasonry in 1999, before entering the seminary he was already a communist. In addition to the pseudo resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the invalidity of the conclave plotted by the St. Gallen mafia that elected him illegally.

Saint Catherine of Siena contradicts Bergoglio because Jesus condemns homosexual priests

Ignorance concerning the Church history and oversimplification. St. Catherine of Siena may have called the Avignon pope (Clement) an antipope (only because Urban VI was elected first; BTW, Msgr. Vigano also misunderstood that crisis in his comments as the argumentation he provided regarding irregularities during the Bergoglian conclave as similar to the argumentation of cardinals that chose Clement (i.e. the anti-pope) ) but it was her very private judgement that meant nothing for the Church.
The Church waited and in Constance treated all three papal claimants (John XXIII, Benedict XIII, Gregory XII) equally asking them to provide a resignation to choose an undisputed pope (Martin V), BTW with a peculiar, unprecedented voting method (and Martin V is considered the valid pope). It was just the most practical way to solve the crisis.
Moreover, most Catholics of that period (and the later times - e.g. Bellarmine in his treatise about the councils) considered Baltasare Cossa - John XXIII as the valid pope. Only at the end of the 19th century (i.e. almost 500 years after the fact) the opinion of historians (there was no official papal judgement on it) shifted to the side of Gregory XII (and A. Roncalli tried to seal the above choosing the same papal name as Cossa i.e. John XXIII).

Bergoglio conspired with Fernández to destroy and replace the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith Bergoglio destroyed the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith and created an anti-Catholic organization to persecute and "excommunicate" Faithful Catholic Christians who do not join him in his rebellion against God and against the Church.
Tucho: When I told him no, at first, he told me "I want to reconfigure it, think about it carefully."
Víctor "Tucho" Fernández: "They even told me that I did not support the Church's vision of homosexuals"

La Nacion: “What I expect from you is undoubtedly something very different”
“not control or condemn”, as the Holy Office did in the past. Furthermore, he asked him not to deal with the issue of abuse – as another section of that “ministry” does – but rather to concentrate on the theological area that needs development and on the promotion of thought.

Archbishop Fernández previously argued in favor of condom use, contradicting Catholic doctrine

"Tucho" Fernández : "More than a friend, I am Bergoglio's son. His words have marked me for the rest of my life"

Those who had already been excommunicated Latae Sentencia are Bergoglio and his accomplice Tucho who from Argentina had already rebelled against God and against the Church.

Proverbs 17:15 He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, both are abominable before God.

Este vídeo muestra que el apóstata y cismático Bergoglio y su cómplice Tucho demuestran su ignorancia de la doctrina católica al declarar inválidamente la excomunión "Latae Sententiae" contra el arzobispo Viganò.
Para el apóstata Bergoglio ni Cristo ni la Iglesia son necesarios para la salvación, sólo él mismo. Recordemos que estamos hablando de aquel que engaña a los pecadores impenitentes, a los ateos, a los cismáticos, a los apóstatas y a las religiones falsas diciéndoles que todos se salvan, pero vemos que Bergoglio hace una excepción al amenazar con la excomunión "Latae Sentencia" sólo a aquellos que no se unen a él en su rebelión contra Dios y la Iglesia. Este vídeo muestra que el apóstata y cismático Bergoglio y su cómplice Tucho demuestran su ignorancia de la doctrina católica al declarar inválidamente la excomunión "Latae Sententiae" contra el arzobispo Viganò.

For the apostate Bergoglio neither Christ nor the Church are necessary for salvation, only himself. Let us remember that we are talking about the one who deceives unrepentant sinners, atheists, schismatics, apostates and false religions by telling them that everyone is saved, but we see that Bergoglio makes an exception to threaten with excommunication "Latae Sentencia" only to those who do not join him in his rebellion against God and the Church.
This video shows that the apostate and schismatic Bergoglio and his accomplice Tucho demonstrate their ignorance of Catholic doctrine by invalidly declaring excommunication "Latae Sententiae" against Archbishop Viganò.
The Apostate Jorge Bergoglio consummates his own schism against God and against the Church

Scandalous connection between 'Pope' Francis and Theodore McCarrick

Bergoglio was disqualified from became a pope due to his heretical, apostate and schismatic past in Argentina.