In addition to being activists in favor of the homosexual lobby, they themselves are all homosexuals. For example, Semeraro himself, when he was bishop of Albano, lived with a priest who was his "boyfriend" for years - and in Rome it was known and their "relationship" was a source of gossip for years.

The other day I commented in an article by @Wilma Lopez that Francis was a hypocrite for talking about homosexuality in seminaries. The reason is the following, and this is well known in his country because he already did it in Buenos Aires: Bergoglio is not homosexual - in the Vatican they knew it because the Jesuits in charge and the superiors knew him well and criticized him for many things, but not for that one-; but he uses homosexuals to achieve his objectives. An example was his former secretary, Fabián Pedacchio: a notorious homosexual, he used him as a spy in the Congregation for Bishops and then got rid of him.

Francis promotes homosexuals because he knows they will be loyal to him, because he knows their dirty laundry and if they rebel he would destroy them. Look if this is serious, how many he has placed in the College of Cardinals and they are going to elect the next pope.

If you allow me to give my opinion, I believe that both pontificates cannot be compared. Many will say, using logic, that Francis is worse, and will affirm that Paul VI, despite the damage he caused in other aspects such as the liturgical aspect, with his encyclicals "Sacerdotalis caelibatus" and "Humanae vitae" had positive things that cannot be extract from the current pontificate. I, in my ignorance, am not so sure. I ask the question: if Bergoglio had been elected pope in 1963, would he have gone as far as he has today? If Montini had been elected pope in 2013, what would his pontificate have been like? I believe that both pontificates have been disastrous and did a lot of damage to the Church in their own way and in their context. The difference is that Paul VI's successors tried to restore the damage, who knows what will happen to Francis' successors.

The reality is that Hollerich's atrocities scandalize us and rightly so. But it happens that we are in a minority in a Church and a society that is increasingly disoriented and without Faith. And it turns out that this man is a cardinal elector, and will continue to be so for many years, so he can choose and, most seriously, be elected pope, because the good cardinals are also in the minority, and as long as Francis remains pope this will only get worse. Therefore, and although we currently refuse to believe it, what prevents that in a few decades, or a century at most, and with another pope and another context, there will no longer be a "storm" and the Church, in the hands of these guys, start "ordaining" women priests? Let's face it, the majority of people, inside and outside the Church, in many countries if it were done today would not only not oppose it but would applaud it.

I'm sorry but I'm not optimistic.

Episkopat w ogóle dopuszcza się nadużyć i wykroczeń w sferze liturgicznej i w każdej dziedzinie, żyjemy w czasach powszechnej apostazji, a biskupi w ogóle zawstydzają innych. Nie twierdzę, że abp Jędraszewski jest doskonały i wzorowy, jestem Hiszpanem i nie znam go zbyt dobrze. Mówię tylko tyle, że nie wierzę, że jakikolwiek polski biskup jest dużo lepszy i że jeśli Franciszek natychmiast przyjmie jego rezygnację, nie mianując go kardynałem, to dlatego, że mu to przeszkadza, bo nie będzie złym Bergogliano jak on i jego przyjaciele. I dodam, że jeśli jego następcą zostanie kardynał Ryś, przyjaciel sodomitów, to Kraków będzie w dużo gorszej sytuacji.

@SonoftheChurch Well, there are much worse ones. He is a priest who loves selfies:

He's 'down with this sort of thing' - is Mayo's Fr John Kenny Ireland's trendiest priest?

@Liam Ronan The article does not specify it, these are "personal photos" of Father Kenny and believe me, he has much worse ones. He is a priest who loves taking selfies.

Father Kenny is the one on top of the car.