la verdad prevalece
The Magisterium of the Church teaches that the elevation of a heretic as pope is invalid and void and also teach that if a pope manifests himself as a heretic he would cease Ipso Facto to be a pope.
So knowing that Bergoglio was already a heretic in Argentina and that he is stubbornly still a heretic, then those who accepted the first deception should repent along with those who accept the …More
The Magisterium of the Church teaches that the elevation of a heretic as pope is invalid and void and also teach that if a pope manifests himself as a heretic he would cease Ipso Facto to be a pope.
So knowing that Bergoglio was already a heretic in Argentina and that he is stubbornly still a heretic, then those who accepted the first deception should repent along with those who accept the second deception of thinking that Bergoglio is still a pope even though he is a formal and manifest heretic.
San Atanasio ora pro nobis
Bergoglian tactics consists in overlooking the heretical, apostate and schismatic past of Bergoglio in Argentina. Then treat him as if he were a pope and apply the rights of legitimate popes to defend a heretic. In other words The Bergoglian trap consists in accepting a heretic as Pope, they first begin by violating the authentic Magisterium by stating that a heretic can become a pope and then …More
Bergoglian tactics consists in overlooking the heretical, apostate and schismatic past of Bergoglio in Argentina. Then treat him as if he were a pope and apply the rights of legitimate popes to defend a heretic. In other words The Bergoglian trap consists in accepting a heretic as Pope, they first begin by violating the authentic Magisterium by stating that a heretic can become a pope and then if any Catholic denounces the false Pope Bergoglio then the Bergoglians even those who They say they do not support their heresies apply the next step which is to use the authentic Magisterium to defend the false pope as if he were a legitimate pope.
Eva
Here is De Mattei praying in Munich
mattsixteen24
I was thinking the traditional Latin mass and the novus ordo.
DEFENSA DE LA FE
I THINK CATHOLICS ATTENDING LATIN MASS DISTINGUISH THEMSELVES AS BEEN REAL CATHOLICS.
THE FALSE church WOULD ATTEND NOVUS ORDO. NOVUS ORDO CAN BE FINE FOR SOME GOOD CATHOLICS BUT IF THE PRIEST DONOT CONSECRATE FOR BEEN ON THE FALSE CHURCH THE EUCARIST IN THAT CASE WILL BE NOT VALID FOR THEM
LETS FIND A LATIN MASS IN OUR AREA AND STICK TO IT.
Thors Catholic Hammer
The Novus Ordo mass is valid. It may not be licit but transubstantiation occurs.
The priests who officiate at Novus Ordo masses are as a rule also validly ordained.
There is no FALSE CHURCH within catholocism merely false doctrines held by catholics..
But what does exist is a frightening and false pope called francis [real name jorge bergoglio] and a real pope called Benedict xvi.
DEFENSA DE LA FE
YES EXACTLY.
WAS I MEANT IS THAT TRIDENTINE LATIN MASS IS LIKE A SHIELD. BUT NOVUS ORDO IS VALID BUT NEED TO BE AWARE SOME PRIESTS DO ILEGAL THINGS IN NOVUS ORDO BUT SOME GREAT PRIESTS PERFORM VALID MASSES IN NOVUS ORDO. JUST BE AWARE.
WHEN I DONOT HAVE A CHANCE TO GO TRIDENTINE I GO TO NOVUS ORDO BUT ALWAYS CHOOSING A RELIABLE PRIEST.
Thors Catholic Hammer
How sad. The now excommunicated and formally heretical Jorge Bergoglio continues to be acknowledged as Vicar of Christ by the majority of Catholics.
Bergoglio says adultery is not an obstacle to receiving Holy Communion.
How can such a man be the “Vicar” of Christ who specifically said the very opposite.?
The OT statement that the number of fools is infinite rings truer each day.
O Maoleoin
Novus Ordo is a new religion founded 1969 by Paul VI.
Thors Catholic Hammer
Er no. Paul V I was a valid pope who changed liturgical rites.
As supreme pontiff he had that authority an d was not bound in liturgical matters by any of his predecessors.
The core doctrines of the catholic church have remained the same before and since Paul V I .
[The current catholic church is experiencing a papal crisis with two popes a false one [bergoglio] who publishes false doctrine and …More
Er no. Paul V I was a valid pope who changed liturgical rites.
As supreme pontiff he had that authority an d was not bound in liturgical matters by any of his predecessors.
The core doctrines of the catholic church have remained the same before and since Paul V I .
[The current catholic church is experiencing a papal crisis with two popes a false one [bergoglio] who publishes false doctrine and a real one [ the elderly and frail Benedict xvi ] who is under house arrest by bergoglio sedated and under control of his guard Ganswein.