Ignoramus: Neo-Cardinal Indulges in Homosex Illusions
Manaus Cardinal Leonardo Steiner, Brazil, has reiterated his 2014 support for state-sponsored homosex concubinages. Speaking to LifeSiteNews.com (September 2), he spread the illusion that such unions …More
Manaus Cardinal Leonardo Steiner, Brazil, has reiterated his 2014 support for state-sponsored homosex concubinages.
Speaking to LifeSiteNews.com (September 2), he spread the illusion that such unions were about “obtaining financial security for homosexuals.” If that were true, this "security" would have to be offered not only to homosexuals, but also to non-sexual residential communities of people who want to claim such privileges.
Despite a rampant promiscuity among homosexuals, Steiner fuels the fantasy that many homosexuals are living together until the "end" of their lives "without security," "without health services," and "without money." He quotes Francis who has spoken many times about this.
But many ordinary Brazilians live this way. Why does Steiner only care about privileged homosexuals?
When asked if he - a Cardinal - accepts the biblical condemnation of homosexual acts, Steiner replied evasively and embarrassed himself by saying, "How can we say that it is a sin if they …More
Speaking to LifeSiteNews.com (September 2), he spread the illusion that such unions were about “obtaining financial security for homosexuals.” If that were true, this "security" would have to be offered not only to homosexuals, but also to non-sexual residential communities of people who want to claim such privileges.
Despite a rampant promiscuity among homosexuals, Steiner fuels the fantasy that many homosexuals are living together until the "end" of their lives "without security," "without health services," and "without money." He quotes Francis who has spoken many times about this.
But many ordinary Brazilians live this way. Why does Steiner only care about privileged homosexuals?
When asked if he - a Cardinal - accepts the biblical condemnation of homosexual acts, Steiner replied evasively and embarrassed himself by saying, "How can we say that it is a sin if they …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Sally Dorman shares this
- Report
Remove share
Neo-Cardinal says homosex is not sinful for non-Christians: Using the logic of not wanting to impose confessional morals on non-Christians, Cardinal Steiner claims that the Church should not try to make society follow its beliefs.
Hugh N. Cry
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Idiot cardinal needs to be laicized.
Jeffrey Ade
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The blind lead the blind.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
One good thing about him is he's going to be 72.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Hopefully when we agaun very soon have a Catholic Pope, this kind of filth will not even be spoken of let alone supported. I wish God would somehow save His Church and get rid of Francis by whatever means he chooses, then by some miracle and intercession to the Holy Spirit and Virgin Mary, we might be blessed with a Catholic Pope. Maybe another Benedict, or Gregory,Innocent , Gelasius or another …More
Hopefully when we agaun very soon have a Catholic Pope, this kind of filth will not even be spoken of let alone supported. I wish God would somehow save His Church and get rid of Francis by whatever means he chooses, then by some miracle and intercession to the Holy Spirit and Virgin Mary, we might be blessed with a Catholic Pope. Maybe another Benedict, or Gregory,Innocent , Gelasius or another great Pius. no more Francis, John, Paul, or John Paul III.
philosopher
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori This Pope is drunk on modernism and should be called on it. In times past, for the good of his soul and Holy Mother Church the Cardinals would have called a special council and put him on trial for heresy. Francis would either publicly recant every error that he has promulgated or if he persists, then he would be deposed and a new orthodox Pope elected. Francis will be Francis …More
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori This Pope is drunk on modernism and should be called on it. In times past, for the good of his soul and Holy Mother Church the Cardinals would have called a special council and put him on trial for heresy. Francis would either publicly recant every error that he has promulgated or if he persists, then he would be deposed and a new orthodox Pope elected. Francis will be Francis but the responsibility of correcting him falls on Cardinals and Bishops. Presently you can count on one hand the number of bishops with the courage to do what needs to be done. But your right, and I in no way wish any harm upon him as I would rather see his repentance and conversion, but God may intervene and remove him in the near future.
Jeffrey Ade
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@philosopher Sadley at this point the College of Cardinals and Bishops no longer practice the Faith. They can not stand for that they do not believe!
philosopher
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Anyone, regardless if Catholic or not and has transgressed the Natural Law has sinned.
John Fritz Logan
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Ah yes, Steiner, he McElroy and Roche, the 3 horrid new cardinals.
Wilma Lopez shares this
- Report
Remove share
When asked if he - a Cardinal - accepts the biblical condemnation of homosexual acts, Steiner replied evasively and embarrassed himself by saying, "How can we say that it is a sin if they don't live the Christian faith?" If Steiner's objection were true, it would be better to keep all people ignorant about Christianity in order to save them from sin, including murder.
DefendTruth
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
John A Cassani
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Keeping people ignorant of the truth has been the basic strategy of neo-casuists for a very long time. It was garbage like this that moved John Paul II to write Veritatis splendor. The fact that this, not even 30 year old encyclical, has been trashed should tell everyone all they need to know about what constitutes the “magisterium” in the post-conciliar era. This guy’s knowledge of theology …More
Keeping people ignorant of the truth has been the basic strategy of neo-casuists for a very long time. It was garbage like this that moved John Paul II to write Veritatis splendor. The fact that this, not even 30 year old encyclical, has been trashed should tell everyone all they need to know about what constitutes the “magisterium” in the post-conciliar era. This guy’s knowledge of theology probably consists of reading summaries of Rahner and Kung, and not much else.