- Report
Social networks
“A politician who symbolically holds up the Rosary is more to be trusted than one who literally takes down the Cross of Christ.”
At least the good cardinal Muller acknowledges and states that Benedict’s conduct in 2013 caused and still causes mental trauma for Catholics.
In addition he asks for theological clarity concerning the relationship between Benedict and his putative successor.
Muller also upholds the teaching concerning no Holy Communion for practising adulterers.
Interesting times ahead.
In addition he asks for theological clarity concerning the relationship between Benedict and his putative successor.
Muller also upholds the teaching concerning no Holy Communion for practising adulterers.
Interesting times ahead.
Not sure what you mean by theological clarity re the relationship between the the two men. I do think, however, that the authority from jurisdiction of a bishop who is emeritus is foggy at best.
It is another VatII/post VatII idea that lacked proper consideration.
If you read the letter from the SCDF it says there must not be Communion given to those who were married validly, divorced, then …More
Not sure what you mean by theological clarity re the relationship between the the two men. I do think, however, that the authority from jurisdiction of a bishop who is emeritus is foggy at best.
It is another VatII/post VatII idea that lacked proper consideration.
If you read the letter from the SCDF it says there must not be Communion given to those who were married validly, divorced, then married in a civil ceremony. The pope did something else: He basically turned the question of the validity of th marriage to the individual conscience. I disagree with this approach, but it's not the same as what you seem to think
It is another VatII/post VatII idea that lacked proper consideration.
If you read the letter from the SCDF it says there must not be Communion given to those who were married validly, divorced, then married in a civil ceremony. The pope did something else: He basically turned the question of the validity of th marriage to the individual conscience. I disagree with this approach, but it's not the same as what you seem to think
To Dr Bobus. We may on the same page.Thank you.
Benedict still speaks in Peters name.
Benedict still speaks in Peters name.
TO DR BOBUS WHO DOES NOT WISH TO BE CONTACTED.
Cardinal Muller has the authority of a catholic bishop and a member of the (discredited) college of cardinals.
He can act by bringing to the attention of the faithful that bergoglio aka francis is not a pope anymore having been excommunicated for formal heresy.
Cardinal Muller has the authority of a catholic bishop and a member of the (discredited) college of cardinals.
He can act by bringing to the attention of the faithful that bergoglio aka francis is not a pope anymore having been excommunicated for formal heresy.
Perhaps he does. But is he right in thinking that.?
For any person to think that francis is a pope would mean accepting an individual who openly rejects the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist and many of His core teachings.
For any person to think that francis is a pope would mean accepting an individual who openly rejects the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist and many of His core teachings.
Act? With what authority?
