en.news
15832

Event: Bergoglio Recycles the Bankrupt and Incompetent

The “unemployed, bankrupt, incompetent and those in need of support, image and political recommendation” who are ignored by everyone go to Bergoglio where they are “revitalised,” writes Mons X. on MarcoTosatti.com (July 13).

Mons. X picks some examples from the list of those performing at the November “The Economy of Francesco” event in Assisi, Italy:

• Muhammad Yunus, 80, Bangladesh, who received the worthless Nobel Peace Prize in 2006 and finances illegal immigration into Europe. In 2011 he was kicked out from the Grameen Bank founded by him and in 2013 accused of tax evasion. He disappeared until Bergoglio resuscitated him.

• Vandana Shiva, 67, India, a food activist who charges $40,000 per speaking lecture, plus a business-class air ticket from New Delhi.

• the Obama prophet Jeffrey Sachs

• Bruno Frey, a “happiness researcher” whose contract with the University of Zurich was not renewed because of doubts about his scientific approach.

• Jennifer Nedelsky, Canada, whose teaching is “concentrated on Feminist Theory."

• Carlo Petrini, 71, (ex-) communist, gastronomist and slow-food activist who said in an interview that he Greta Thunberg and Bergoglio will save the earth.

Picture: © Mazur, CC BY-NC-SA, #newsSkufieoopl

Ultraviolet
Repeating the same old lies after they've been disproven isn't going to make them true, Jmy1975 Just like "blocking" me won't prevent me from pointing that fact out.
Jmy1975
@Ultraviolet I didn't block you because I thought you couldn't comment. Anyway, logic, reason, and canon law support my "lies" no matter how much you really want your boy Francis to be legit (and implicate the Holy Spirit in apostasy). Satan can't cast out Satan, as Jesus said, and neither can the Holy Spirit elect a man who doesn't even believe in God.
Not that you will watch, but this is Ann …More
@Ultraviolet I didn't block you because I thought you couldn't comment. Anyway, logic, reason, and canon law support my "lies" no matter how much you really want your boy Francis to be legit (and implicate the Holy Spirit in apostasy). Satan can't cast out Satan, as Jesus said, and neither can the Holy Spirit elect a man who doesn't even believe in God.

Not that you will watch, but this is Ann Barnhardt on the matter. She's a lot like you: mean, insufferable, and arrogant. But on this she's right and explains why: www.youtube.com/watch

Take the 2 hours you usually spend on this site (or more) and watch it. She certainly knows more about it than you do.

Ciao.
Ultraviolet
"Anyway, logic, reason, and canon law support my "lies"..."
...which explains why you've lost every time you've tried using any of those tools to support them. Instead, like usual, you'd much rather refer to things you can't use as though You already did. This is a standard tactic straight outta your forum play-book.
"no matter how much you really want your boy Francis to be legit"
...and once …More
"Anyway, logic, reason, and canon law support my "lies"..."

...which explains why you've lost every time you've tried using any of those tools to support them. Instead, like usual, you'd much rather refer to things you can't use as though You already did. This is a standard tactic straight outta your forum play-book.

"no matter how much you really want your boy Francis to be legit"

...and once again, you're implying motives without any shred of proof.

First, he isn't "my boy". I've explained that to you before, so this isn't a mistake on your part, it's a deliberate lie. Naughty, naughty!

Second, he's the Pope.

Third, he is legit even though we happen to dislike him. That's the whole problem. Won't be the first time, there's a "bad" Pope. If you some research on you own for a change instead of having it spoon-fed through YouTube, you'd realize that. Our current Pope is nothing, new. Just more bad news...

The Holy Spirit didn't elect Francis into the Papacy, the Curia did. There isn't any 'implication' at all. This is just mind-numbingly failed reasoning on your part.

"and neither can the Holy Spirit elect a man who doesn't even believe in God."

Once again, you're making the same mistakes you usually do. You don't know how the Holy Spirit reasons or how it thinks.. It is... the Holy Spirit and Scripture is remarkably taciturn on that entity.

Likewise, you don't know if Pope Francis does or doesn't believe in God. It may be his notion of "God" is in error compared to what the Church teaches. But there's precious little to support the claim the man "doesn't believe in God", i.e. he's an atheist.

If Pope Francis believes in God, even if his understanding is in error, he'd still qualify for election using the standards you stated.

"Not that you will watch, but this is Ann Barnhardt on the matter. She's a lot like you: mean, insufferable, and arrogant."

You have a nasty habit of projecting your worst faults onto others. In this case, the meanness and the arrogance. I see Holy Cannoli's label of "insufferable" really stung you. Like every other abuse-victim, you cope by inflicting it on someone else.

'cept it doesn't bother me the way it obviously got to you. Sorry 'bout dat.

"Take the 2 hours you usually spend on this site (or more) and watch it. She certainly knows more about it than you do."

Wow! You just qualified for a Two For Tuesday deal! :D
Ultraviolet
Protip: Just because I leave my account active doesn't mean I'm -on- GTV. The moar u know! Anyway, as GTV's Official and Self-Appointed Seer, I'm going to display my oracular powers while simultaneously showing why I don't waste my time with YouTube presentations from Benedict's Fan Club.
She went on about "the Munus" didn't she? The rubes always fall for that one. Even without watching the vid, I …More
Protip: Just because I leave my account active doesn't mean I'm -on- GTV. The moar u know! Anyway, as GTV's Official and Self-Appointed Seer, I'm going to display my oracular powers while simultaneously showing why I don't waste my time with YouTube presentations from Benedict's Fan Club.

She went on about "the Munus" didn't she? The rubes always fall for that one. Even without watching the vid, I know she did. 'Cuz I'm a Seer, this is what seers do annnnnnnnnd I'm wearing mah Gary Spivey Psychic Wig. You may laugh, but as you can see, that thing works. I was gonna say "works like magic" but somebody (and I'm NOT thinking you, either, btw) would jump all over that. ;-) Anyway, congratulations...Here's your booby-prize.
Jmy1975
The biggest irony here is some keyboard warrior from New Hampshire who traffics in memes questioning the intellectual bona fides of anyone much less someone who in a previous life was a successful commodity trader and now has devoted her life to Catholicism. If you don't agree with her, fine, but it should take more than your unearned arrogance.
@Ultraviolet You didn't watch the video, of course …More
The biggest irony here is some keyboard warrior from New Hampshire who traffics in memes questioning the intellectual bona fides of anyone much less someone who in a previous life was a successful commodity trader and now has devoted her life to Catholicism. If you don't agree with her, fine, but it should take more than your unearned arrogance.

@Ultraviolet You didn't watch the video, of course you didn't, because you live in a world of masturbatory self regard/ narcissism. You don't care about the truth of anything, you're like @Be Ye Separate, a nominal Catholic just here to kill time. Well it's ok.

Barnhardt actually thinks Benedict is the worst pope we've ever had. But he's pope.

Francis is antipope, and most likely the forerunner Of the antichrist and antichurch and you can smirk and and be facetious and try and make it personal, but nothing you or I or anyone does will change that fact.

You chose poorly. Good luck with all at, #faketrad #fakecatholic

P.s. It's no accident that Bergolio took the name of St, Francis, the man who prophesied Bergolio's coming. Bergolio took the name to delight in mockery of the man who told do a non elected pope.
Ultraviolet
"ah, more proof that a dog always returns to his vomit."
The irony of that coming from you while you're repeating the same mistakes you've made before. :D
"You didn't watch the video, of course you didn't,"
Someday you'll realize that the stuff people put on YouTube is identical in format and content to the garbage CNN and MSNBC produces for the mainstream public. The only difference is you happen …More
"ah, more proof that a dog always returns to his vomit."

The irony of that coming from you while you're repeating the same mistakes you've made before. :D

"You didn't watch the video, of course you didn't,"

Someday you'll realize that the stuff people put on YouTube is identical in format and content to the garbage CNN and MSNBC produces for the mainstream public. The only difference is you happen to buy into this brand of garbage.

The worst indictment of the YouTube you're pushing is it hasn't given you any new intellectual ammunition while you're shooting off your mouth. Not snappy re-loads, no high-visiblity tritium observations, no devastating Canon Law hollow-points.

You're still shooting blanks with the same old abusive junk. YouTube has given you nothing of any value except some energizing confirmation-bias and an echo-box for what you want to hear.

I'm confident in my abilities to argue my position so I don't need that.

"You don't care about the truth of anything, you're like @Be Ye Separate, a nominal Catholic just here to kill time. Well it's ok."

...except this "nomimal Catholic" uses the truth to send you packing every time you forget your place and try arguing with anything more technically substantial than your empty personal attacks.

Here ya' go. Double-shot Fallacies on Two For Tuesday!
Ultraviolet
"...and you can smirk and and be facetious and try and make it personal,..."
...said the guy who JUST said, "You don't care about the truth of anything, you're like @Be Ye Separate, a nominal Catholic just here to kill time."
Then you bawww about "try and make it personal" right after you did so. Ooooh dem double-standards. You haz 'em baaaaad.
But that's just more of your last fallacy, anyway …More
"...and you can smirk and and be facetious and try and make it personal,..."

...said the guy who JUST said, "You don't care about the truth of anything, you're like @Be Ye Separate, a nominal Catholic just here to kill time."

Then you bawww about "try and make it personal" right after you did so. Ooooh dem double-standards. You haz 'em baaaaad.

But that's just more of your last fallacy, anyway. You're not unloading with all that dynamite stuff Ann Barnhardt just filled your head with.

Nope. This is all you... and it reads just like you. :P

""Benedict is still pope, Francis is antipope..."

Just so you won't complain I short-changed you on your latest double-shot of fallacies.
Jmy1975
Benedict is pope. He is a clever German who thought he could bifurcate the papacy. What he did was allow evil to sit on his throne. Francis is the prophet/forerunner of the antichrist.
Ultraviolet
C'mon, Alex A. When Benedict is at the Vatican his fan-boys say he's a "prisoner". When he visited his brother, they said the Vatican was trying to kick him out and "get rid of him"..
Alex A
He did. He's back as a 'prisoner' of the Vatican.
F M Shyanguya
Ultraviolet
Retired generals are still addressed by their old rank, even when they're no longer in command.
Jmy1975
No other pope that resigned was ever addressed as pope emeritus or "your holiness". Fail again.
Ultraviolet
"No other pope that resigned was ever addressed as pope emeritus or "your holiness". (citation needed)
Further, even if you manage, Pope Francis obvious charity to an ailing nonagenarian shouldn't be so casually dismissed. .More
"No other pope that resigned was ever addressed as pope emeritus or "your holiness". (citation needed)

Further, even if you manage, Pope Francis obvious charity to an ailing nonagenarian shouldn't be so casually dismissed. .
salliperson
Has anyone see Pope Benedict lately? I know this question doesn't pertain to the post but I heard that he never came back from visiting his brother.