Could there be any motivation other than a desire for the truth that today's CDF would issue their response negating the veracity of the alleged apparition that was approved by bishop Dom Carillo Gritti, Bishop of Itacoatiara which originally granted official Church approval for pilgrimages and public worship to be celebrated in the chapel where the apparitions of the Queen of the Rosary and of Peace first took place?

Since Vatican II , the Faithful have been encouraged by the Holy See to decide for ourselves whether or not we want to believe if an apparition is worthy of belief. Since when did we practice this independence of thought in Roman Catholicism? How many people are tending to look at Our Lady of Fatima, thumbing our noses, to tell her "This Pope says I don't have to accept your warnings, and if it's all the same to you - I won't!"

lots of us are becoming a law unto ourselves in deciding whether or not we practice obedience to the messages already called "worthy of belief" ie Apparitions shown to have been sent by Our Lord Jesus Christ via Our Lady.

If an apparition such as "Fatima" has been accepted and a Feast Day allotted to it, it is wrong for any member of the Church in the upper levels to encourage us in independence of thought, as we end up blaming Christ when we don't like the Messages. Preferring that they are not true just to stop acting on them is awful!.

In one way, this contempt shown by the Vatican towards the initial request that the third secret be revealed no later than 1960, is appalling. It is actually apostasy against a DIRECT request from God through Our Lady. This apostasy was against an apparition already declared authentic and worthy of belief prior to Vatican II. Additionally, this contempt at the upper levels of the Church has worked it's way down to a huge percentage of the flock, who mirror the Pope's attitude of contempt, and has over time encouraged in the faithful a degree of independence of thought and judgement that a flock of servants of Our Lord should never have! Shouldn't we be servants of Christ, trained to be obedient to His Will. These days, the Pope is going one step further, he appears to directly ridicule the former Doctrines that the Church has always taught, and given great positions to other scary people who do likewise.

Sometimes we know the apparitions to be true to start with because a Bishop has told us so (eg Marie Julie Jahenny - Medically proved to have survived over 30 days being examined in a hospital, eating only one Consecrated Host each day, yet remaining very healthy. So who's going to deny she's likely to be sustained by God?

Now, it goes a stage further, this independence of thought has spread into other aspects of the Church's day to day life. First the Popes disobeyed God, then God permitted that the Popes were no longer obeyed by the Bishops, and the rest of us don't have much respect left for any of them.

....and all because no-one released the 3rd Secret of Fatima and open contempt .

The Vatican's refusal to comply with Christ's request has been a terrible act of apostasy, a direct impertinence, a grave insult to Our Lord and a slap in the face to Our Lady.and really very sorry we are all likely to be who did not heed the known warnings of this false ecumenical church, superimposed over the REAL One. Plenty of evidence that it IS a false church, warnings given us all by Christ through various other Mystics. All of them, Stigmatics and Eucharistic Fasters which they could not be on their own. So, there really is no excuse for none compliance on the behalf of the Clergy, Bishops, Cardinals, or Popes to any of them.

www.communityofhopeinc.org/…/marie julie.html
onepeterfive.com/400-years-ago-o…
sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1846sallette.asp
www.youtube.com/watch
www.youtube.com/watch
archive.fatima.org/essentials/facts/rianjo.asp
archive.fatima.org/essentials/facts/miracle.asp

ourlady3.tripod.com/emmerick.htm
www.youtube.com/watch

There are two kinds of revelations: (1) universal revelations, which are contained in the Bible or in the depositum of Apostolic tradition transmitted by the Church. These ended with the preaching of the Apostles and must be believed by all; (2) particular or private revelations which are constantly occurring among Christians

When the Church approves private revelations, she declares only that there is nothing in them contrary faith or good morals, and that they may be read without danger or even with profit; no obligation is thereby imposed on the faithful to believe them.

Speaking of such revelations as (e.g.) those of St. Hildegard (approved in part by Eugenius III), St. Bridget (by Boniface IX), and St. Catherine of Siena (by Gregory XI) Benedict XIV says: "It is not obligatory nor even possible to give them the assent of Catholic faith, but only of human faith, in conformity with the dictates of prudence, which presents them to us as probable and worthy of pius belief)" (De canon., III, liii, xxii, II).
----------------------------------------------------------
To repeat:

When the Church approves private revelations, she declares only that there is nothing in them contrary faith or good morals, and that they may be read without danger or even with profit; no obligation is thereby imposed on the faithful to believe them.

Private Revelations

Deposit of Faith (depositum fidei) = Sacred Scripture + Holy Tradition.

Cf CCC > Article 2 of the Creed - www.vatican.va/…/p1s1c2a2.htm