Whoo whee! Check out da Bold Text. Looks like
@Thors Catholic Hammer has some
"bold-hurt" goin' on here.
:D"Its noteworthy that you absolutely refuse to engage with the argument that Amoris laetiiae contains formal heresy in promoting sacriligious communion."You've used this tactic before. It's YOUR job to prove your claim and the only proof you've supplied is endlessly
repeating the claim.
Your interpretation of the document is your
own.
Your interpretation has zero support among Francis' staunchest critics among the Curia, people who have a much more serious interest in seeing him removed.
"You then hide behind the pretense that popes since Vat2 promulgated doctrinal heresy when in office despite failing to post one single SPECIFIC example of same when asked."That lie again? Oh dear. We all know what happens when you repeat
that lie. I don't provide ONE example, I post links to the big scary list of ALL of them for ALL the Popes, from critics who are every bit as fierce and opinionated as you are. List to follow at the bottom, just like always.
"You also fail to address the manifest errors that Benedict made in canon law concerning canon 332 no 2."Manifest errors? None
supplied, none
presented except as always YOU claiming they exist
without ever demonstrating any.
I'm more than happy to discuss Canon Law 332 Section 2 with you. Show a "manifest error" in Benedict XVI's resignation. c'mon... well?
YOUR MORALLY PERVERTED ANTI CATHOLIC UNIVERSE...and
this from the man who likes to wring his hands in other posts complaining about my "bile" and "abusive posts".
Oh, you poor innocent
lamb. How
terribly you've been wronged!
:PYou're like all pathological liars, Thor. You LOVE dishing out that kind of abusive garbage but then you're sensitive delicate feelings are easily bruised when you're mocked for being a deceitful idiot.
Now then... Let's begin with a quote from Piux IX
"If a future pope teaches anything contrary to the Catholic Faith, do not follow him." -Blessed Pope Pius IX
Saint John XXIII was supposedly and anti-pope, apostate and heretic.
introiboadaltaredei2.blogspot.com/…/the-case-agains…stevensperay.wordpress.com/…/pope-st-john-xx…www.amazon.com/…/B0007F89MOromancatholicfaith.weebly.com/…/the_scandals_an…Paul VI was supposedly an anti-pope, apostate and heretic.
novusordowatch.org/paul-vi/crc-internet.org/…/6-book-against-…pontifexverus.wordpress.com/…/answering-a-fre…romancatholicfaith.weebly.com/…/the_scandals_an…John Paul I was supposedly an anti-pope, apostate and heretic.
novusordowatch.org/john-paul-i/www.ncronline.org/…/shortest-pontif…www.scribd.com/…/The-Scandals-an…Saint John Paul II was supposedly an anti-pope, apostate and heretic.
www.traditionalmass.org/articles/article.phpwww.calefactory.org/misc-v2-heresiesofjp2.htmBenedict XVI was supposedly an anti-pope, apostate and heretic.
www.calefactory.org/misc-v2-heresiesofb16.htmwww.opusdeialert.com/footnotes.htmwww.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/anti-pope-bened…www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/…/principles-of-c…holywar.org/Ratzinger.htmnovusordowatch.org/benedict-xvi/