en.news

Papal Preacher Rants Against "Traditionalism" (Video)

Cardinal Raniero Cantalamessa quoted in his March 26 Lenten Sermon to Francis and the Roman Curia the “great historian” Jaroslav Pelikan (+2006), an American Lutheran pastor who later in life became Orthodox.

Cantalamessa parroted approvingly Pelikan's claim that "tradition is the living faith of the dead - that is, the faith of the fathers that I continue to live. Traditionalism is the dead faith of the living."

"I repeat. Tradition is the living faith of the dead and traditionalism is the dead faith of the living."

In real life, those churches which Cantalamessa would brush off as "traditionalist," are full of life, future, children, families and vocations, while Cantalamessa’s "living tradition" is a synonym for departing from tradition.

#newsOpxrwexulm

00:33
112K
Prayhard

The anti church is dying. Its believers are unfailingly stubbornly stupid.

atreverse pensar

The Church is One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.
Not your modernist spawn.

Ultraviolet

Nice masks, now why aren't you all sitting six feet apart ("two meters") ? Social distancin', gaiz, social distancin'.

mccallansteve

They hate it because it is the true Mass

Ave Crux

They only attack Traditionalism and its adherents...those who worship and believe as the Church always worshiped and believed for nearly 2 Millennia. You will never hear them attacking Communism (even though it was precisely about this that Our Lady warned us at Fatima), or the frightful human oppression and slavery in countries like China, or any of the real enemies of Faith, morality or the traditional family.
Nor do they care about such things as ongoing sacrilege in churches throughout the world, the profanation of the Blessed Sacrament, the unspeakable scandal of aberrant sexual relationships openly given a pass by the Church, etc..
It's frightening the darkness that has come upon the hierarchy of the Catholic Church.

Cecilia Lopez

Perhaps they aren't actually the hierarchy. It is impossible for the Church to defect from the faith. So who these guys are, I don't know.

Ave Crux

@Cecilia Lopez Yes, the defined dogma and truth that the Church is indefectible used to cause me deep disquiet and confusion, because that would seem to suggest that all the Modernist heterodoxy being poured out like an avalanche upon our souls deserves our credence and adherence.
Then one day I received a blinding light at Holy Mass (TLM) that what I was seeing in Rome was not the Catholic Faith, but an imposture by the Church's enemies which have invaded the Bosom of Holy Mother Church and obscured her spotless integrity of doctrine, like an "eclipse" -- an analogy used with great effect by Archbishop Vigano.
It brings to mind that which Saint Athanasius once said so beautifully for the comfort of the Faithful at the time the Arian heresy obscured the true Faith everywhere; whose words then, as even now, were a blessing midst the confusion -- a now present day reality which Archbishop Vigano often expounds upon with such lucidity.
I will paste the text of Saint Athanasius below, as it is so powerful and eloquent:
"May God comfort you. I know moreover that not only this thing saddens you, but also the fact that while others have obtained the churches by violence, you are meanwhile cast out from your places. For they hold the places, but you the Apostolic Faith.
They are, it is true, in the places, but outside of the true Faith; while you are outside the places indeed, but the Faith, within you. Let us consider whether is the greater, the place or the Faith. Clearly the true Faith. Who then has lost more, or who possesses more? He who holds the place, or he who holds the Faith?
Good indeed is the place, when the Apostolic Faith is preached there, holy is it if the Holy One dwell there. (After a little:) But ye are blessed, who by faith are in the Church, dwell upon the foundations of the faith, and have full satisfaction, even the highest degree of faith which remains among you unshaken.
For it has come down to you from Apostolic tradition, and frequently has accursed envy wished to unsettle it, but has not been able.
On the contrary, they have rather been cut off by their attempts to do so. For this is it that is written, ‘Thou art the Son of the Living God,’ Peter confessing it by revelation of the Father, and being told, ‘Blessed art thou Simon Barjona, for flesh and blood did not reveal it to thee,’ but ‘My Father Who is in heaven,’ and the rest.
No one therefore will ever prevail against your Faith, most beloved brethren. For if ever God shall give back the churches (for we think He will) yet without such restoration of the churches the Faith is sufficient for us.
And lest, speaking without the Scriptures, I should [seem to] speak too strongly, it is well to bring you to the testimony of Scriptures, for recollect that the Temple indeed was at Jerusalem; the Temple was not deserted, aliens had invaded it, whence also the Temple being at Jerusalem, those exiles went down to Babylon by the judgment of God, who was proving, or rather correcting them; while manifesting to them in their ignorance punishment [by means] of blood-thirsty enemies.
And aliens indeed had held the Place, but knew not the Lord of the Place, while in that He neither gave answer nor spoke, they were deserted by the truth. What profit then is the Place to them?
For behold they that hold the Place are charged by them that love God with making it a den of thieves, and with madly making the Holy Place a house of merchandise, and a house of judicial business for themselves to whom it was unlawful to enter there. For this and worse than this is what we have heard, most beloved, from those who are come from thence.
However really, then, they seem to hold the church, so much the more truly are they cast out. And they think themselves to be within the truth, but are exiled, and in captivity, and [gain] no advantage by the church alone. For the truth of things is judged…"

P N F

Or we could go with St. Paul instead:
"Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle." (2 Thessalonians 2:15)

Louis IX

3 for 3

aderito

What is wrong with the tradition ?is it because is too hard ,?it takes spiritual dedication ?Is it because it warns about the evils of modernism???