God gave Satan the time (75 to 100years) and the power to destroy His Church. God would raise the smallest victim soul He could find to engage in the battle, by restoring the very gift that Adam had intentionally, with his own will withdrew from, the Divine Will. In less than 5 years what Adam lost would be returned. The Gift of the Divine Will was given to Luisa Piccarreta by Jesus on September 8, 1889, on the Feast of the Nativity of Mary. At 24 and a half years old, and after years of intense suffering, Luisa received this gift to allow God to live and work within her. Pope Leo XIlI granted permission for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass to be offered in Luisa Piccarreta's bedroom on March 8, 1898 Official Document: The permission was granted via a papal rescript. Confirmation: This privilege was later confirmed by Pope Saint Pius X in 1907 1884, Luisa Piccarreta was undergoing a significant turning point in her spiritual life following a vision of Jesus carrying the Cross. This …More
Yes, its Solitude and Lonelyness... but Trusting in God the Father's Mercy... Follow the Narrow Path.... We are Living this Right Now, with all the Exposure that we see in our Holy Vatican controversial youtube.com/watch?v=DmzDQ-rEe7k
VATICAN CITY, 29 April 2026 — Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández has prepared a declaration of schism should the Society of St. Pius X proceed with episcopal consecrations in Écône on July 1. The Vatican is also making pastoral arrangements to welcome those who may leave the SSPX after it ordains new bishops without papal permission...
@V.R.S. , I’m not sure. But I believe the more pressing question is: What will the cardinals and bishops do? Will they choose to remain in communion with Protestants and other sects, effectively continuing the de facto ‘new church’ that has already taken shape? Or will they finally take action to dismantle this decades-long spectacle—this Circus du Soleil—that has blinded our eyes and poisoned the souls of believers?
04/29/2026 Entire blog as a free PDF eBook. Phishing attacks are online scams in which fraudsters pose as trustworthy institutions (banks, courier services, government agencies) to trick victims into revealing login credentials, credit card information, or personal data. This is how AI defines phishing—in my own words: the Antisocial Intelligence from Google’s fake news factory. The scammer creates a fake website that looks deceptively similar to your bank’s login page and sends it to the victim, for example via email, with a request to log in immediately, otherwise… some reason is given here. Why does he do this? To obtain the victim’s login credentials for their bank account. Of course, simply obtaining the login credentials to the bank is not enough for the scammer to plunder the victim’s account. This is the first step to check the account balance and decide whether it’s worth taking the next step. The best and most effective way to check whether a site is a phishing attempt is …
**The Aleteia article is spot-on and a helpful guide.** Your quoted text about the **green cover** accurately describes it: it's the 1997 Latin *editio typica* (typical edition), which became the official reference text with the definitive English translation and minor refinements from the earlier 1992/1994 French-based version (often tan cover). ### Key Context on Editions by Cover Color - **Tan**: Early 1990s provisional English translation (French original). Good historically, but superseded. - **Green**: 1997 official Latin-based Second Edition. This was long considered *the* standard authoritative version. Many people (including traditional-leaning Catholics) still prefer it for its "classic" status and pre-2018 wording on certain topics. - **Blue** (and some newer hardcovers/white editions): Incorporates the 2018 change to paragraph 2267 on the death penalty (now called "inadmissible" rather than allowing for rare cases). This is the most current official text. ### Thoughts on Your …More
1) Matthew 7:15-16: “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?” 2) Does any human creature made of clay (Genesis 2:7), conceived in sin, born in guilt (Psalm 50:7), that maggot, a worm (Job 25:6), who will be judged by God upon death (2 Timothy 4:1), have any justification for leading souls to the devil? a) Ecclesiasticus (Sirach) 15:20; “He never commanded anyone to be wicked, nor did He give anyone permission to sin.” b) Exodus 32:21–23; Moses said to Aaron, “What has this people done to you that you have brought such a great sin upon them?” c) Deuteronomy 30:17-18; “But if your heart turns away and you do not listen, but are led astray and worship other gods and serve them, I declare to you today that you will surely perish.” d) Jonah 2:9; “Those who worship vain idols forsake their own salvation.” e) 1 John 5:21; My children,…More
On April 27, Bishop Emeritus Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, commented on PillarsOfFaith.net regarding the scandalous reception of Mrs. Sarah Mullally at the Vatican. The woman bears the title and attire of the Anglican “Archbishop” of Canterbury. Monsignor Strickland managed not to mention Pope Leo XIV, even though he had received the lady as an equal “bishop.” Rather, Bishop Strickland merely reaffirmed the Catholic teaching that the priesthood is divinely instituted and that the Church has no authority to ordain women. He argued that public gestures that give the appearance of honoring someone without valid ordination in an office could confuse the faithful about the nature of the Catholic priesthood and ordination. In conclusion, he called on Catholics to respond with prayer, Eucharistic adoration, penance, and reparation for the Church. #newsTwjnhxknic
When Prevost challenged Catholic morality to promote the "informal," sacrilegious blessing for sodomite concubines—describing the agenda of his synodal sect—he stated: "Equal freedom for men and women, freedom of religion—all of that would take priority over that particular issue."
The Vatican’s Dicastery for Divine Worship has acknowledged receipt of a “hierarchical recourse” filed against the apparent refusal of Bishop Michael Martin of Charlotte, North Carolina, to respond to requests concerning liturgical matters. The Vatican letter, dated February 16 and signed by Fr. Pierre Paul, confirms that the case has been assigned protocol number 369/25 and will be examined according to the applicable procedures. However, in the Vatican, such procedural formalities often lead nowhere; even the acceptance of an appeal does not guarantee any intervention or substantive action. Bishop Martin has aggressively curtailed Catholic liturgical practices in the Diocese of Charlotte. #newsAhximseszf
04/28/2026 Entire blog as a free PDF eBook. I created a Facebook account in 2008 to stay in touch with friends. I only used it sporadically. It wasn’t until six years ago that I decided to start posting my content on this platform as well. What happened next? I described that in the article Facebook Censorship. Later, there was a false sense of relief, and Mr. Zuckerberg promised: “No more censorship!!” You can find the details here. That motto still holds true today, albeit in a slightly modified form: Never again without censorship! Less Facebook. More life. My Facebook posts were severely restricted—more specifically, their reach. Due to shadowbanning, my new posts weren’t visible to my friends until several days later, or not at all. Despite these tactics, many people still managed to find my posts this way. The statistics showed that about 1% of my readers used this method. They used it because two months ago, I was asked to take a selfie to prove that I wasn’t a crocodile. …
As the article says the murder of the 11 million unborn babies is just the surface of the horror of abortion. At least 165 million decedents of the 11 million will also not be born. 176 million cry out to God for vengeance.