en.news
194K

Henry Sire Backs Rumours: Francis Seriously Ill

“As the New Year approaches, I should mention that many Vatican insiders say that Francis is ill with cancer and has limited time left,” the historian Henry Sire wrote on Twitter.com (December 27). …More
“As the New Year approaches, I should mention that many Vatican insiders say that Francis is ill with cancer and has limited time left,” the historian Henry Sire wrote on Twitter.com (December 27).
LifeSiteNews.com journalist Maike Hickson has also heard these persistent rumours from her Vatican contacts,
“Cardinals are said to be meeting in preparation for a future conclave. God finally is the author of life, and He will decide. We keep praying for Francis and resist his errors,” she comments.
#newsSdhraahabi
Jan Joseph
De opvolgers van paus Franciscus willen zo snel mogelijk de macht overnemen en paus Franciscus zijn levenswerk, het vernietigen van de Protestantse Rooms Katholieke kerk, voortzetten.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
America Magazine (radical liberal Jesuit rag) has on their website today a wish list of all the things Francis may do in 2022 namely publish a document reforming the Curia, creating 10 new voting cardinals in a consistory (please God, no more Francis consistories), taking multiple trips to Lebanon, South Sudan, Malta, etc. They applaud his supposed "great health". Fact is, Francis is not in "great …More
America Magazine (radical liberal Jesuit rag) has on their website today a wish list of all the things Francis may do in 2022 namely publish a document reforming the Curia, creating 10 new voting cardinals in a consistory (please God, no more Francis consistories), taking multiple trips to Lebanon, South Sudan, Malta, etc. They applaud his supposed "great health". Fact is, Francis is not in "great" health, as confirmed by multiple reliable sources, none of the supposed trips planned have been verified/planned/approved by the Vatican (which is a bad sign. JPII and Benedict had a log of trips that had already been approved months in advance), the reform of the Curia has hit a roadblock, and maybe it's possible Francis won't be around in late Fall as the America Magazine claims the consistory would be. They don't mention his bad health anywhere. It's all wishful thinking. There's two things that darken America's bright hopes for Francis. One is that at least 5 Catholic websites and Reuters news service has reported that Francis is (despite a game of smoke and mirrors), very seriously ill. The second is that when the VAtican was asked to confirm those reports, they would not answer. That is a very bad sign. I read a book on John XXIII recently, and it was claimed that the VAtican never mentioned that the Pope was gravely and terminally ill until 10 days before his death. Before that, his absences from ceremonies were excused by the VAtican as "fatigue, a cold, a virus, or the flu).
I think America Magazine is in for a very big shock.
John Fritz Logan
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Well...
Francis appointed 16 new cardinals going to 132, but thankfully and susprisingly only a very few bad ones... he held it earlier then expected. Number of cardinal electors won't go below 120 for more than a year.
His new curia document mainly leaves the next pope with even more of a free hand. Its exact implications are still unclear.
Multiple trips had to be cancelld …More
@Kenjiro M. Yoshimori Well...

Francis appointed 16 new cardinals going to 132, but thankfully and susprisingly only a very few bad ones... he held it earlier then expected. Number of cardinal electors won't go below 120 for more than a year.

His new curia document mainly leaves the next pope with even more of a free hand. Its exact implications are still unclear.

Multiple trips had to be cancelld cause of Francis' great health.
Prayhard
Hopefully he repents before he dies.
GTVisrockin
Hope he converts to the "one true holy" apostolic church, then repents before he meets the just judge.
Les Crispi
I don't want anyone to suffer with cancer. I would like Bergolio to understand what he's done wrong, and admit it, and repent. Maybe this pain will help him do so? I don't know. But he and Benedict have messed things up so badly...we need a miracle. Or miracles.
Caroline03
In prohibiting Latin Rite Priests to celebrate the Tridentine Rite (The adjective Tridentine refers to any thing or person pertaining to the city of Trent, Italy (Latin: Tridentum). ) Francis is "anathema" for stating the Roman Catholic Rite of Mass is inducive to hostility and discord.
"CANON VI.--If any one saith, that the canon of the mass contains errors, and is therefore to be abrogated; let …More
In prohibiting Latin Rite Priests to celebrate the Tridentine Rite (The adjective Tridentine refers to any thing or person pertaining to the city of Trent, Italy (Latin: Tridentum). ) Francis is "anathema" for stating the Roman Catholic Rite of Mass is inducive to hostility and discord.

"CANON VI.--If any one saith, that the canon of the mass contains errors, and is therefore to be abrogated; let him be anathema."
Council of Trent, On the Sacrifice of the Mass

Church Teaching on the Mass:

"Let all everywhere adopt and observe what has been handed down by the Holy Roman Church, the Mother and Teacher of the other churches, and let Masses not be sung or read according to any other formula than that of this Missal published by Us. This ordinance applies henceforth, now, and forever, throughout all the provinces of the Christian world, to all patriarchs, cathedral churches, collegiate and parish churches, be they secular or religious, both of men and of women - even of military orders - and of churches or chapels without a specific congregation in which conventual Masses are sung aloud in choir or read privately in accord with the rites and customs of the Roman Church. This Missal is to be used by all churches, even by those which in their authorization are made exempt, whether by Apostolic indult, custom, or privilege, or even if by oath or official confirmation of the Holy See, or have their rights and faculties guaranteed to them by any other manner whatsoever.
" Encyclical "Quo Primum" (Promulgating the Tridentine Liturgy) by Pope St. Pius V, 1570

"We specifically command each and every patriarch, administrator, and all other persons or whatever ecclesiastical dignity they may be, be they even cardinals of the Holy Roman Church, or possessed of any other rank or pre-eminence, and We order them in virtue of holy obedience to chant or to read the Mass according to the rite and manner and norm herewith laid down by Us and, hereafter, to discontinue and completely discard all other rubrics and rites of other missals, however ancient, which they have customarily followed; and they must not in celebrating Mass presume to introduce any ceremonies or recite any prayers other than those contained in this Missal.
" Encyclical "Quo Primum" (Promulgating the Tridentine Liturgy) by Pope St. Pius V, 1570

Church Teaching on the Missal Used at Mass:
"All other of the churches referred to above, however, are hereby denied the use of other missals, which are to be discontinued entirely and absolutely; whereas, by this present Constitution, which will be valid henceforth, now, and forever, We order and enjoin that nothing must be added to Our recently published Missal, nothing omitted from it, nor anything whatsoever be changed within it under the penalty of Our displeasure.
" Encyclical "Quo Primum" (Promulgating the Tridentine Liturgy) by Pope St. Pius V, 1570

"Furthermore, by these presents [this law], in virtue of Our Apostolic authority, We grant and concede in perpetuity that, for the chanting or reading of the Mass in any church whatsoever, this Missal is hereafter to be followed absolutely, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty, judgment, or censure, and may freely and lawfully be used. Nor are superiors, administrators, canons, chaplains, and other secular priests, or religious, of whatever title designated, obliged to celebrate the Mass otherwise than as enjoined by Us. We likewise declare and ordain that no one whosoever is forced or coerced to alter this Missal, and that this present document cannot be revoked or modified, but remain always valid and retain its full force notwithstanding the previous constitutions and decrees of the Holy See, as well as any general or special constitutions or edicts of provincial or synodal councils, and notwithstanding the practice and custom of the aforesaid churches, established by long and immemorial prescription - except, however, if more than two hundred years' standing.
" Encyclical "Quo Primum" (Promulgating the Tridentine Liturgy) by Pope St. Pius V, 1570


catholicessentials.net/themass.htm
Nonsacerdotus9025
And "anathema" means cursed. He has a lifetime of heresy so he doesn't fear God.
Les Crispi
Miracles happen.
aderito
Only God knows
mccallansteve
Poor Francis, he will be judged mightily because of his position but this doesn't bother him at all. After he dies, how long will it take for them to make him a saint?
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
He won't be a saint. IN a few months after Francis is dead, that attitude of "canonizing" everything and everyone associated with strongly supporting Vatican II will be at an end. And don't be surprised if some of these Vatican II popes declared "saints" are quietly removed/downgraded from that honor by future popes.
가입을 원합니다
V.R.S.
@가입을 원합니다
An explanation is simple: we live in very holi days. Everybody can see it around.
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
Personally, because I've read about them and seen the effects of their pontificates (even though I wasn't even born when John XXIII or Paul VI were around, and not until JPII was in office 15 years), I would never consider any of those three as "saints", and certainly not and never, Pope Francis. Bergoglio a saint? Maybe in a Masonic Lodge, or a satanic church.!
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
Not a surprise. He looked terrible at Christmas, as well as angry. He ignored the faithful walking up and back down the nave of St. Peter's. No one in the crowd cheered or applauded "Viva il Papa" like they did for JPII or Benedict XVI at Christmas Mass. No applause at all. And Francis' face looked terrible on Sunday, swollen lips and face.
I would be willing to believe these reports that he is ill …More
Not a surprise. He looked terrible at Christmas, as well as angry. He ignored the faithful walking up and back down the nave of St. Peter's. No one in the crowd cheered or applauded "Viva il Papa" like they did for JPII or Benedict XVI at Christmas Mass. No applause at all. And Francis' face looked terrible on Sunday, swollen lips and face.
I would be willing to believe these reports that he is ill with cancer. I think that is the reason he attacked the faithful Catholic who celebrate the Tridentine Latin Mass, and persecuted them with his restrictions. He saw it as a job undone, and wanted to finish them up before he died.....which perhaps may be before the Spring or Summer.
That cartoon above which has Zuppi, a clone of Francis, emerging from the shell of Francis probably will not happen. Any cardinals with good sense will know that the Francis papacy, and what he did to the Tridentine LAtin MAss, has made the CAtholic Church fall into a steep decline. All the important markers point to Francis' agenda and papacy as being a disaster for the Church...Mass attendance, priestly vocations, religious vocations for nuns, for cloistered Orders, for brothers, baptisms, Holy Communions, Catholic marriages etc.etc.
Even with the disaster of Pope Paul VI reign, there were at the time of his death, 4,600 seminarians in Italy( diosecean). It stabilized, and then went up slowly under JPII, accelerating under the all too brief reign of Benedict XVI to slightly more than 6,000, and in almost 9 years has collapsed to 1,080 under Francis (worse than even under Paul VI).
Pope Francis, his agenda, and his associates I believe will be rejected by the cardinals when they meet in conclave (which probably is very soon). Not all of Francis' cardinals are radical dissenting liberals like himself. I predict that we will get a new Pope who is very much more like Benedict XVI, and even to the right of him. He will be someone who does not reject Vatican II, but is not especially enthusiastic towards it either. He will recognize the beauty and value of the traditional Mass and religious life. I believe he will actually state in no uncertain terms that much of the interpretation of Vatican II has been a mistake, especially regarding the Holy Mass, the priesthood and seminary, and religious life...especially for nuns. He will not be a "Pachamamma" pope. Much of what Francis did, and his associates cling to, will be politely but forcefully repudiated, and in the Vatican, all the Francis appointments will be sacked....from high to low.
He won't be a super young new Pope (probably a little over 70), but God willing, he might have over 10 years to undo the damage to the Church done by Francis and company ( which unfortunatly, might take more than 15+ years to total supress.) But the new Pope won't be Zuppi, or Tagle, or Parolin, or Farrell, or the archbishop of Naples, or Cupich, Gregory, or any of that ilk. He may be a cardinal known as orthodox. He may even be an ARCHBISHOP or PATRIARCH snubbed and denied the red hat by Francis in his many consistories to appoint many questionable men. Fortunatly, some of the more radical ones he appointed cardinals are either already too old (78-80), or dead.
philosopher
I think your hopeful assessment is on target; he is in the winter of his papacy, and we should not despair, spring is coming.
Ultraviolet
@philosopher Several years later... :D Actually, this is a superb "seer" prediction since it's vague, could apply at any time and El Francesco is old and very fat which is a bad combo for anyone. This coming year, a year or two after that... doesn't matter. You called it correctly and, in all fairness, I heard it here first!
Kenjiro M. Yoshimori
Thank you! I was just guessing (as well as praying) that when the time comes, (and from what I have read in several posts here, and on other sites, is that Francis is actually seriously ill despite his or Vatican cover-ups). Remembering about John XXIII and his illness of stomach cancer, he was diagnosed at the end of 1961, but still managed to carry on fairly well despite obvious signs of a decline …More
Thank you! I was just guessing (as well as praying) that when the time comes, (and from what I have read in several posts here, and on other sites, is that Francis is actually seriously ill despite his or Vatican cover-ups). Remembering about John XXIII and his illness of stomach cancer, he was diagnosed at the end of 1961, but still managed to carry on fairly well despite obvious signs of a decline in appearance, for nearly 18 months. He was still getting up and going to work and officiating at ceremonies up to four weeks before his death. Another guess of mine is that things will go along as if normal for another 2-3 months. Then Francis will start cancelling audiences or appearances. That will become more frequent, until everyone knows that something is wrong. He will experience a crisis, perhaps be transferred to the Policlinico Agostino Gemelli (hospital where he was operated on and that JPII used many times), and after a few days he will either die there, or be transported back to the Vatican and die there shortly after. I'm not a doctor (mu uncle is 😊, but if Francis has intestinal or stomach cancer, he could hast for 2 years. But if it's metastasized, or if it's in the pancreas, he'd be gone in 6 months. I don't wish anyone illness like that....but I do believe it's all true.....and more so than we know.