Viganò Rejects Defense Against Schism Accusation

Yes, nonsense. Vugano might be willing to build a new CAtholic Church, but it's to save the CAtholic Church. At 83, it's not for himself. He's concerned for the Church. Many people, especially in Italy, already look to him as a sort of substitute-pope. I would follow him before I'd think of anything Francis and his gays dictate.
By the way, I looed at Francis' Angelus address today on YouTube, his weekly appearance from his window to the faithful. He seemed none too good. Not as lively or animated as he sometimes is, coughed several times, and took huge deep gasps occasionally.
Don't be surprised if he's sick again...or something is building up in him again.

Klaus, Vigano called out and fought the most powerfull sodomite McCarrick. Without tireless effort and enormous courage of Vigano, that very dangerous job will not be done. Even while McCarrick was a sodomite perpetrator, predator for 4,5 decades.
Do you understand how that works? What militant sodomites of Deepchurch can do to each and every wistleblower?
And why is he alone in this?
Where are his other brothers bishops? Does they have any contact with each other and especially Vigano about that particular matter?
Don't you think Vigano approached some of them and gave them some more information and evidences?
But, if they don't dare...
Could he not be traying to get some of them more courageous to enjoy this most important battle of their and our lives?
And what else does he have?
What options?
Remember Athanasius the Great and his struggles...

Archbishop Viganò digs his own grave, by extravagant statements

“I believe that once again, we are seeing play out in real time the destruction of the person and reputation of another outstanding cleric of the Roman Church, since, because he lacks the courage to bring a canonical complaint to the competent tribunal, he is attempting to win his case by public debate and diatribes: a thing which can never succeed, since the Church of Jesus Christ is a juridical entity with proper laws and procedures, and justice must be sought in accord with them.
Contrariwise, if the Archbishop changes his legal strategy immediately by publicly appealing to a provincial council against the actions of a dicastery which was erected not by Pope Benedict XVI but by another claiming the papal office during his lifetime, he will put the entire dispute squarely on the proper legal grounds and avoid a charge of schism. For no one appealing to the proper tribunal is a schismatic. He will also in the strongest possible juridical manner put in doubt the claim of Pope Francis to have the right to move against him.
In such a case, the Bishops of the Roman Province can decide to call or not call the Council: the charges against Pope Francis being sufficient to hold the Apostolic See impeded (see here fore more about this). If the Bishops were to refuse to convene, then the Archbishop could rightfully appeal to any provincial council in the world, since such a refusal would confirm the juridical doubt concerning the impeded see and a conspiracy to overthrow the Church. Furthermore, even if the provincial council in the Roman province determine against him, he could appeal to other provincial councils, since such decisions put in writing in a provincial council would demonstrate the unjust basis of Pope Francis’ claims to office. This would raise the controversy to the international level and require a general council to hear the case, as numerous provincial councils could rightfully demand such be convened.
This is the way to fight as a Catholic in the footsteps of great saints such as St. Athanasius of Alexandria. Let us pray that the Archbishop wake up fast, before he is eaten up by the crocodile on the Tiber.”

((why get thrown out, letting things carry on, when this could actually be the moment to challenge and cause the Holy Church to investigate the legitimacy of PF?))