"Francis Is an Open Enemy of Catholicism"
"Disaster" is the only word for Francis’ pontificate, Christopher Ferrara told Gloria.tv at the Roman Forum in Gardone, Italy (video below). Ferrara is a famous New York lawyer who prevailed in court …More
"Disaster" is the only word for Francis’ pontificate, Christopher Ferrara told Gloria.tv at the Roman Forum in Gardone, Italy (video below).
Ferrara is a famous New York lawyer who prevailed in court against Governor Cuomo's Covid closure of churches and synagogue (2020) and recently defended the pro-life hero, Father Fidelis.
In 2000 years of Church history, we have not seen anything like Francis, Ferrara observed, “It looks like the terminal stage of the post-conciliar crisis”.
He cannot imagine a Pope "more opposed to the fundamentals of our religion” than Francis, whom he calls "an open enemy of Catholicism” because, for example, he denies that the faith is a set of propositions to be believed because they are a prescription for human happiness in this world and the next.
Ferrara understands that Francis is trying to arrange affairs by appointing cardinals, “We're basically talking about ecclesiastical lunatics who will comprise the majority of the next conclave.”
Homosexualism is …More
Ferrara is a famous New York lawyer who prevailed in court against Governor Cuomo's Covid closure of churches and synagogue (2020) and recently defended the pro-life hero, Father Fidelis.
In 2000 years of Church history, we have not seen anything like Francis, Ferrara observed, “It looks like the terminal stage of the post-conciliar crisis”.
He cannot imagine a Pope "more opposed to the fundamentals of our religion” than Francis, whom he calls "an open enemy of Catholicism” because, for example, he denies that the faith is a set of propositions to be believed because they are a prescription for human happiness in this world and the next.
Ferrara understands that Francis is trying to arrange affairs by appointing cardinals, “We're basically talking about ecclesiastical lunatics who will comprise the majority of the next conclave.”
Homosexualism is …More
- Report
Social media
Change post
Remove post
Shutup Oprah
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I want every picture of ugly hateful Francis ripped off every Catholic Church now
Dennis Joseph shares this
- Report
Remove share
Ivan Tomas
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
An enemy of Catholicism is an enemy of the Church.
When that enemy wear the white robe and walks around in Vatican teaching the Catholics and whole world a diabolical anti-gospel, then such person should be called with a proper names: anti-pope, false prophet.
It's not that difficult, dear Ferrara.
Go and help cardinals and bishops to start and hold a Catholic Imperfect Council! Once!
Thank you.More
An enemy of Catholicism is an enemy of the Church.
When that enemy wear the white robe and walks around in Vatican teaching the Catholics and whole world a diabolical anti-gospel, then such person should be called with a proper names: anti-pope, false prophet.
It's not that difficult, dear Ferrara.
Go and help cardinals and bishops to start and hold a Catholic Imperfect Council! Once!
Thank you.
When that enemy wear the white robe and walks around in Vatican teaching the Catholics and whole world a diabolical anti-gospel, then such person should be called with a proper names: anti-pope, false prophet.
It's not that difficult, dear Ferrara.
Go and help cardinals and bishops to start and hold a Catholic Imperfect Council! Once!
Thank you.
Jungerheld
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I distinctly recall both Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict said, "It's not only about rules" and Pope Francis says, "It's not about rules." There is a wide chasm of difference between the two statements.
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Maybe. But who made Bergoglio the Archbishop of Buenos Aires? Who made him a Cardinal?
Shutup Oprah
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Who knew?
Malki Tzedek
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Rather pathetically, the Bergoglio papacy has much in common with the title character in King Lear. For those who don't know this play, it is a tragedy. Fragmenting a kingdom, be it political or eccliastical, never ends well.
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
la verdad prevalece
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
James Edward Brady
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Apostasy from the top…
Hey! Wait a minute... How could a true pope be "An Open Enemy of Catholicism"?! 
@Live Mike He can't unless his election was invalid to begin with. Fidelity to Christ and willful intent to destroy His Church are contradictory to The Lords promise to St Peter and his successors.
Papal infallibility, only applies to solemn teachings of faith and morals, not to disciplinary decisions or even to unofficial comments on faith and morals. He is a human and also makes mistakes and sins. A pope’s private theological opinions are not infallible; only what he solemnly defines is considered to be infallible teaching. Let's hope he gets some divine inspiration...
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Wojtyla and Ratzinger institutionalized the Modernist Revolution that began formally at Vatican II. Bergoglio is only completing what they began. No matter how often or how loudly they would have protested that judgment, from Assisi to Altar Girls - and much beyond - they institutionalized the Revolution. It could be argued that the introduction of Altar Girls was the primordial act that ushered in …More
Wojtyla and Ratzinger institutionalized the Modernist Revolution that began formally at Vatican II. Bergoglio is only completing what they began. No matter how often or how loudly they would have protested that judgment, from Assisi to Altar Girls - and much beyond - they institutionalized the Revolution. It could be argued that the introduction of Altar Girls was the primordial act that ushered in the present gender chaos. If anyone doesn't like this assessment, they can lump it.
Boanerges Boanerges
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
As you mention, John Paul II and Benedict XVI had their faults but they certainly did not continuously and systematically destroy the faith, quite contrary. Therefore, your statement is unfair and actually sounds much like what Bergoglians are saying when they prepare ground for another diabolical attack on the faith so that they can portray it as if it is in continuity with popes of the Catholic …More
As you mention, John Paul II and Benedict XVI had their faults but they certainly did not continuously and systematically destroy the faith, quite contrary. Therefore, your statement is unfair and actually sounds much like what Bergoglians are saying when they prepare ground for another diabolical attack on the faith so that they can portray it as if it is in continuity with popes of the Catholic Church.
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Had their faults? As for your personal attack: As I say, you can lump it.
Arthur McGowan
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Simon North: "If anyone doesn't like this assessment, HE can lump it." The "singular 'they'" is a weapon of the gender chaos.
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Mea culpa.
Rafał_Ovile
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@Simon North your adherence to false conclusions about Bergoglio: 1. being the legit pope; 2. and that his erring being output result of predecessing popes' input errors is consequence of warped philosophy disabling you to recognize reality. Properly formed conscience, willingness , allow the intellect through cognitive tools and basic canonic knowledge to make distinction between similarities and …More
@Simon North your adherence to false conclusions about Bergoglio: 1. being the legit pope; 2. and that his erring being output result of predecessing popes' input errors is consequence of warped philosophy disabling you to recognize reality. Properly formed conscience, willingness , allow the intellect through cognitive tools and basic canonic knowledge to make distinction between similarities and identicals, the level and scope of errors, finally cannonically elected pope from usurper ... Try also to hear prof. Seifert , prof. Rao etc. who as Ferrrara, all see Francis as extra ordinary "Destroyer".
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
I never said that Bergoglio was a legitimate Pope. I never said he wasn't an "extraordinary Destroyer." My point was that Bergoglio's predecessors were Modernist heretics who set the groundwork for Bergoglio's bringing their errors to their logical conclusion.
You ought to brush up on those "cognitive tools and canonic language to make distinctions between similarities and identicals." I'll let …More
I never said that Bergoglio was a legitimate Pope. I never said he wasn't an "extraordinary Destroyer." My point was that Bergoglio's predecessors were Modernist heretics who set the groundwork for Bergoglio's bringing their errors to their logical conclusion.
You ought to brush up on those "cognitive tools and canonic language to make distinctions between similarities and identicals." I'll let you off easy as to how I would normally respond to such drivel, as it's my impression that English isn't your first language.
You ought to brush up on those "cognitive tools and canonic language to make distinctions between similarities and identicals." I'll let you off easy as to how I would normally respond to such drivel, as it's my impression that English isn't your first language.
Rafał_Ovile
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Simon North language skills are irrelevant to truth , facts and evidence.
Mr Ferrara and others are trying to convey that Francis' errors are different, being distinct and grave Church destruction in 2000 year history. On the contrary to your false claim of "laying ground", his predecessor popes prevented apostatical errors from being implemented... i.e. Summorum Pontificum , Veritatis Splendor, …More
Simon North language skills are irrelevant to truth , facts and evidence.
Mr Ferrara and others are trying to convey that Francis' errors are different, being distinct and grave Church destruction in 2000 year history. On the contrary to your false claim of "laying ground", his predecessor popes prevented apostatical errors from being implemented... i.e. Summorum Pontificum , Veritatis Splendor, Familiaris Consortio, Evangelium Vitae etc. The rising progressive antichurch "coup d'etat" existed paralelly inside the Church centered around the Cologne declaration in oppsition to John Paul II and Benedict XVI, against whom they constantly revolted....
Finally pope JP2 Universi Dominici gregis constitution and pope BXVI's abdication without resigning Petrine Office (munus) was the mastermind move to secure invalid (uncannonical) election for the upcoming Church Destroyer and protect the Church infallibility by preventing any legitimate erroneous changes .
Mr Ferrara and others are trying to convey that Francis' errors are different, being distinct and grave Church destruction in 2000 year history. On the contrary to your false claim of "laying ground", his predecessor popes prevented apostatical errors from being implemented... i.e. Summorum Pontificum , Veritatis Splendor, Familiaris Consortio, Evangelium Vitae etc. The rising progressive antichurch "coup d'etat" existed paralelly inside the Church centered around the Cologne declaration in oppsition to John Paul II and Benedict XVI, against whom they constantly revolted....
Finally pope JP2 Universi Dominici gregis constitution and pope BXVI's abdication without resigning Petrine Office (munus) was the mastermind move to secure invalid (uncannonical) election for the upcoming Church Destroyer and protect the Church infallibility by preventing any legitimate erroneous changes .
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Your first sentence is correct. If you are not aware of the heresies of Wojtyla and Ratzinger, do some homework. I suspect that you were born after Vatican II and therefore have not really been taught the Faith. Bottom line: either you're a Catholic or you're not. There's no such thing as mostly Catholic.
Rafał_Ovile
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Simon North you're not in power neither to command me or anyone else what to do nor to declare what is true... If you want to know the truth then have to conform thoughts to reality. Also knowing the difference between material and formal heresy could help you understand what I have stated above and that Mr Ferrara speaks the truth about the substantial difference between all (& post-council) popes …More
Simon North you're not in power neither to command me or anyone else what to do nor to declare what is true... If you want to know the truth then have to conform thoughts to reality. Also knowing the difference between material and formal heresy could help you understand what I have stated above and that Mr Ferrara speaks the truth about the substantial difference between all (& post-council) popes and Francis...
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
You accused me of saying things in your first response to me that I never said. I think that rather compromises your credibility.
However, since this is not the forum to explain to you many things about which you are obviously oblivious - and since I doubt your ability to understand them if I attempted to explain them - I'll end this conversational contretemps. I have no desire to be complicit in …More
You accused me of saying things in your first response to me that I never said. I think that rather compromises your credibility.
However, since this is not the forum to explain to you many things about which you are obviously oblivious - and since I doubt your ability to understand them if I attempted to explain them - I'll end this conversational contretemps. I have no desire to be complicit in taking time away from your high school homework assignments.
However, since this is not the forum to explain to you many things about which you are obviously oblivious - and since I doubt your ability to understand them if I attempted to explain them - I'll end this conversational contretemps. I have no desire to be complicit in taking time away from your high school homework assignments.
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Thank you. The Faux Council committed "identify theft" against the Ancient Faith, and Wojtyla and Ratzinger were among its major architects.
philosopher
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
The only pope in the history of the Church that has tried with all his might to make heterodoxy the norm and orthodoxy a sin.
Caroline03
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
@123jussi Do you think it might be that if we just sit and do nothing, it's a case of "Faith without works is dead." James 2:26
It's reiterated too!...
James 2:17
So too, faith by itself, if it does not result in action, is dead.
James 2:20
O foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is worthless?
Also Ezekiel 3:17 condemns us if we don't make a noise and alert him.
Ezekiel 3 BSB …More
@123jussi Do you think it might be that if we just sit and do nothing, it's a case of "Faith without works is dead." James 2:26
It's reiterated too!...
James 2:17
So too, faith by itself, if it does not result in action, is dead.
James 2:20
O foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is worthless?
Also Ezekiel 3:17 condemns us if we don't make a noise and alert him.
Ezekiel 3 BSB (biblehub.com)
It's reiterated too!...
James 2:17
So too, faith by itself, if it does not result in action, is dead.
James 2:20
O foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is worthless?
Also Ezekiel 3:17 condemns us if we don't make a noise and alert him.
Ezekiel 3 BSB (biblehub.com)
Simon North
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Assisi? The Church has no mission to the Jews - only dialogue? How quickly we forget.
Rafał_Ovile
- Report
Change comment
Remove comment
Simon North seeing Assisi without Dominus Iesus is survivorship bias. Nevertheless, overlooking the sodomic, plandemic, prochoice etc. missions of Francis' antichurch is insanity...